Jump to content

Showing results for tags 'uccess'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • The Consumer Forums: The Mall
    • Welcome to the Consumer Forums
    • FAQs
    • Forum Rules - Please read before posting
    • Consumer Forums website - Post Your Questions & Suggestions about this site
    • Helpful Organisations
    • The Bear Garden – for off-topic chat
  • CAG Community centre
    • CAG Community Centre Subforums:-
  • Consumer TV/Radio Listings
    • Consumer TV and Radio Listings
  • CAG Library - Please register
    • CAG library Subforums
  • Banks, Loans & Credit
    • Bank and Finance Subforums:
    • Other Institutions
  • Retail and Non-retail Goods and Services
    • Non-Retail subforums
    • Retail Subforums
  • Work, Social and Community
    • Work, Social and Community Subforums:
  • Debt problems - including homes/ mortgages, PayDay Loans
    • Debt subforums:
    • PayDay loan and other Short Term Loans subforum:
  • Motoring
    • Motoring subforums
  • Legal Forums
    • Legal Issues subforums


  • News from the National Consumer Service
  • News from the Web


  • A Say in the Life of .....
  • Debt Diaries
  • Shopping & Money Saving Tips
  • chilleddrivingtuition
  • Homegirlxx


  • The Youth Academy
    • The Youth Consumer Service
  • Miscellaneous

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start



About Me


Found 1 result

  1. I appealed against an "illegal invoice" as I call them, back in April.Excel parking ,Canal street Nottingham.I asked for loads of documents like who is the landowner, Excels contract with the landowner, a pre estimate of Excels losses etc.They never came up with anything.They also failed to come up with proof of their losses to POPLA. the Reference No. is 2561654014.The assessor was Farah Ahmad, who stated quote:- "It is necessary for the operator to provide an explanation as to how this sum was arrived at as an estimate of the damage which could be caused by the appellants alleged breach.However,the operator has not provided a breakdown of costs under each head of claim.I am unable to see how the parking charge amount has been calculated.In addition,the operator has included "Central Payments Office(CPO) Indirect Overheads".I do not accept that these costs have been incurred as a direct result of the appellants breach.As the operator has not produced a breakdown of costs,I am unable to determine the proportion of these costs in relation to the other heads of claim listed by the operator.On this occasion,I am not satisfied that the operator has discharged the durden.In consideration of all the evidence before me, I find that the operator has failed to prove that the parking charge amount was agenuine pre estimate of loss.Accordingly,this appeal must be allowed".Unquote..............That makes it 33-0 to me.Not all my tickets.I do them for drivers at work, family, friends etc.
  • Create New...