Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder

pot-less

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

About pot-less

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Is there any way I can get "out of my depth" taken off of my thread title?? - it's making me sound a little weak - I need to focus on strong and brave!! lol!!
  2. I've just done it (yay - brave ol me!) I've been told that they will be in touch closer to the date of the conference with all of the details - but I still gave her my telephone number just to be sure they have it Will follow up in writing (I even remembered to take her name!) and copy to the court. Something along the lines of: "further to my tele con this morning with 'cobbetts lady' I understand that you will give me notice before the date of the tele conference that this has been arranged as requested. I have also, during our conversation, provided you with my home telephone number" Sound ok???
  3. Thanks - that's a good idea! (i have just spoken to the court to ask a few questions. up until now I thought I had to go to the court for this - the lady has just told me that cobbetts have to ring me I'm so dim!!) Would it be best to put this in writing so that I can put a copy in my file?? (also then I can't get tounge tied on the telephone and screw it all up! )
  4. Hi everyone! Nothing has happened in the last month. I've heard nowt from Cobbetts so I am just assuming that the telephone conference will go ahead. Do I need to do anything in preparation do you think? I wouldn't need to do my court bundle for this would I? I know I have a little while to go yet as the court thing is not until 18th May but I am off on a break soon and want to get my head straight so I am ready for it when I get back!
  5. Thanks both of you! Sorry if I seemed a little glum but this is just one of many things that seem to be going wrong for me at the moment! So are you saying that at the telephone conference I should be ok with going down the fast track route rather than fighting for small claims? If I went down the fast track route and lost (i know, i know - but lets just test from every angle, I told you I was feeling glum!) could I end up having to pay their costs? (just off to look up what the diffence between small claim and fast track actually is on t'internet!)
  6. This is really getting me down now. I have just received the following from the court: DISTRICT JUDGE BLAH BLAH has considerd the statements of case and allocation questionnaires submitted in this claim and has decided that a hearing is necessary before a final decision about allocation can be made. DISTRICT JUDGE BLAH BLAH orders you to attend at (time) on the (date) at Blah blah county court.....(address) THE REASON FOR THE HEARING IS AS FOLLOWS: 1 The issues raised are not suitable for determination in Small Claim Track. The court propose to allocate to Fast track. IMPORTANT NOTICE This hearing will take place by way of a telephone conference. The Defendant's Legal Representative is ordered to arrange the telephone conference. Please quote telephone number 01234567890 then arranging your telephone conference. Time estimates for hearings must be accurate as they will not be allowed to over-run. In the event that a time estimate is insufficient then please contact the Court. Please note that time has been allocated for the Judge to reads all papers in advance of the hearing. NOTE: Note If you fail to attend the hearing, the court may order you to pay the costs of the other party, or parties that do attend. Failure to pay those costs within the time stated may lead to your statement of case being struck out. I have used all of the same information as everyone on here (cust, copied, pasted etc) so why am I the one that's not getting any results?? Why is my judge on the banks side?? I'm thinking of jacking it all in! I don't have the confidence for this, I haven't a clue what to say or do. I truly am out of my depth!
  7. Right, it's all printed out and ready to go (but my daughter is ill so i'm not able to take it this afternoon - will be tomorrow now) Does it need a covering letter to the court do you think? Should I flag up the change in S69 daily rate as I had previously got it wrong? (I have changed it on the new particulars but should I write and let them know I made a mistake?)
  8. Sorry - 1 last question for this part - Do I put in a schedule dated today or the date of my original claim? I know the interest amount would be a bit different between the two - I have sent "up to date" versions everytime a schedule has been required but have since learned that I should have changed the date on my computer to show the same interest as my original one.
  9. As I thought - Waaaaay more than my claim! Oops. Fingers crossed for me then, Assuming all else is right I will hand deliver that to the court hopefully tomorrow! Thanks for coming to my rescue again!
  10. Right - bear with me here. I'm starting to confuse myself again. I "think" the only bits I need to take out are: This sentance as I am not claiming the overdraft interest back This paragraph as I did not get an SAR And this point for the same reason as above! Does that sound about right?? The "brief outline of claim" section has me a little bewildered with all of its professional speak. Is there anything I may need to remove from this section?? What does 'in terrorem' mean - My computer keeps putting red wiggly lines under it?? and last but not least (for the moment anyway! ) on my N1 I appear to have got the S69 daily interest rate at 91p - which by the calculation method I have since found is quite wrong (too high) I copied and pasted that onto there originally not realising I should have changed it - Have I buggered it up? would it be ok to just give the correct rate on these expanded POC's that I send back? Thanks very much!
  11. Wow! Thanks very much for all of that. Will have a good read through it and make the necessary alterations (and then post back on here to make sure I've done it properly no doubt!!) Thanks very much - you are a star!
  12. Anyone about that can help me with the details I need to get to the judge?? (please, please, please!)
  13. I'm thinking that my judge may be on the bank's side
  14. Finally got a copy of the original letter this mornng. It reads as follows: Before diestrict judge **** sitting at **** county court (address) Upon reading the court fil IT IS ORDERED THAT 1 The claim be stayed as it makes no serious attemp to comply with CPR 16.4(1) by settin gout a concise statement of the fact. (stylised particulars do not constitute compliance.) The claimant must amend or substitute its particulars of claim setting out the claimants case in plain english by 4 pm on the 19th February 2007 and in default, the claim be struck out without further notice. If the above order is complied with the Defendant has permission to file and serve an amended defence in accordance with CPR 16.5 setting out its case in plain english. 2 This order was made without a hearing. Any party affected by it may apply 7 days of service for it to be set aside, varied or stayed. Dated 31 January 2007 The judge has allowed my 14 days (up on 19/03/09 @ 4pm) to get this information to the court!! Please help - I don't have a clue what they want from me. What is a CPR??
  15. I'm not very good at wording letters - does this sound ok for the main part??: I have been advised that my claim has been struck out due to non-compliance of the Judges request. I am very concerned about this as I have not received any correspondence from the court since the receipt of my Allocation Questionnaire on 09th January 2007. I have, this afternoon, been advised on the telephone by a staff member that a letter was sent out to me on 31st January 2007. I would appreciate it if you could send me a copy of this letter in the hope that I can provide the Judge with the information required and continue my claim
×
×
  • Create New...