Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

About pot-less

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Is there any way I can get "out of my depth" taken off of my thread title?? - it's making me sound a little weak - I need to focus on strong and brave!! lol!!
  2. I've just done it (yay - brave ol me!) I've been told that they will be in touch closer to the date of the conference with all of the details - but I still gave her my telephone number just to be sure they have it Will follow up in writing (I even remembered to take her name!) and copy to the court. Something along the lines of: "further to my tele con this morning with 'cobbetts lady' I understand that you will give me notice before the date of the tele conference that this has been arranged as requested. I have also, during our conversation, provided you with my home telephone
  3. Thanks - that's a good idea! (i have just spoken to the court to ask a few questions. up until now I thought I had to go to the court for this - the lady has just told me that cobbetts have to ring me I'm so dim!!) Would it be best to put this in writing so that I can put a copy in my file?? (also then I can't get tounge tied on the telephone and screw it all up! )
  4. Hi everyone! Nothing has happened in the last month. I've heard nowt from Cobbetts so I am just assuming that the telephone conference will go ahead. Do I need to do anything in preparation do you think? I wouldn't need to do my court bundle for this would I? I know I have a little while to go yet as the court thing is not until 18th May but I am off on a break soon and want to get my head straight so I am ready for it when I get back!
  5. Thanks both of you! Sorry if I seemed a little glum but this is just one of many things that seem to be going wrong for me at the moment! So are you saying that at the telephone conference I should be ok with going down the fast track route rather than fighting for small claims? If I went down the fast track route and lost (i know, i know - but lets just test from every angle, I told you I was feeling glum!) could I end up having to pay their costs? (just off to look up what the diffence between small claim and fast track actually is on t'internet!)
  6. This is really getting me down now. I have just received the following from the court: DISTRICT JUDGE BLAH BLAH has considerd the statements of case and allocation questionnaires submitted in this claim and has decided that a hearing is necessary before a final decision about allocation can be made. DISTRICT JUDGE BLAH BLAH orders you to attend at (time) on the (date) at Blah blah county court.....(address) THE REASON FOR THE HEARING IS AS FOLLOWS: 1 The issues raised are not suitable for determination in Small Claim Track. The court propose to allocate to Fast track.
  7. Right, it's all printed out and ready to go (but my daughter is ill so i'm not able to take it this afternoon - will be tomorrow now) Does it need a covering letter to the court do you think? Should I flag up the change in S69 daily rate as I had previously got it wrong? (I have changed it on the new particulars but should I write and let them know I made a mistake?)
  8. Sorry - 1 last question for this part - Do I put in a schedule dated today or the date of my original claim? I know the interest amount would be a bit different between the two - I have sent "up to date" versions everytime a schedule has been required but have since learned that I should have changed the date on my computer to show the same interest as my original one.
  9. As I thought - Waaaaay more than my claim! Oops. Fingers crossed for me then, Assuming all else is right I will hand deliver that to the court hopefully tomorrow! Thanks for coming to my rescue again!
  10. Right - bear with me here. I'm starting to confuse myself again. I "think" the only bits I need to take out are: This sentance as I am not claiming the overdraft interest back This paragraph as I did not get an SAR And this point for the same reason as above! Does that sound about right?? The "brief outline of claim" section has me a little bewildered with all of its professional speak. Is there anything I may need to remove from this section?? What does 'in terrorem' mean - My computer keeps putting red wiggly lines under it?? and last bu
  11. Wow! Thanks very much for all of that. Will have a good read through it and make the necessary alterations (and then post back on here to make sure I've done it properly no doubt!!) Thanks very much - you are a star!
  12. Anyone about that can help me with the details I need to get to the judge?? (please, please, please!)
  13. I'm thinking that my judge may be on the bank's side
  14. Finally got a copy of the original letter this mornng. It reads as follows: Before diestrict judge **** sitting at **** county court (address) Upon reading the court fil IT IS ORDERED THAT 1 The claim be stayed as it makes no serious attemp to comply with CPR 16.4(1) by settin gout a concise statement of the fact. (stylised particulars do not constitute compliance.) The claimant must amend or substitute its particulars of claim setting out the claimants case in plain english by 4 pm on the 19th February 2007 and in default, the claim be struck out without further notice.
  15. I'm not very good at wording letters - does this sound ok for the main part??: I have been advised that my claim has been struck out due to non-compliance of the Judges request. I am very concerned about this as I have not received any correspondence from the court since the receipt of my Allocation Questionnaire on 09th January 2007. I have, this afternoon, been advised on the telephone by a staff member that a letter was sent out to me on 31st January 2007. I would appreciate it if you could send me a copy of this letter in the hope that I can provide the Judge with the information req
  • Create New...