Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About shellysexbomb

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Evening all Was wantin to pick your brains over an issue I have with Samsung. I bought an american style fridge freezer in december of 2007, which turned out to have dangerous manufacturing defects, samsung sent out an engineer to rectify this. When it was 3 and a half years old it packed in , with what turned out to be a design fault (featured on watchdog) samsung replaced it. The SAME fault has now occurred (3 years on) and samsung are adamant that this slightly newer model does not have the same design fault and will not do anything. I quoted
  2. Have just spent half hour on the phone with them. Apparently they acted on my complaint about unfair charges/fees and removed them all from my account, but then stuck £300 repossession fee on. As they cannot and have not repossessed my car I argued that I was not liable for this. Result was, £311 paid and ownership transferred
  3. By my reckoning I owe £311, then some late payment interest. They are charging me £100 for 4 letters and £100 for the field agent. I get that these are 'penalties'. I havent paid them yet and shall be offering a settlement based on my calculations, so we shall see
  4. I am ALMOST free of this. Have an agreement to pay slightly less than the original monthly payment but am now down the the last few hundred. Put the account into dispute in July as it transpires that they have me owing a couple of hundred more than my reckoning (which they cant explain and are 'looking into it') They sent a field agent out 3 times in the last two months.......despite the fact that i am paying them. Today they rang and informed me that they have added £100 charges for the field agents fees........surely they cant do this? The field agent said
  5. They CAN be beaten. Its all just shilly-shallyin hoping you will get 'scared' and pay up. Stand your ground, they have NOTHING on you, just laugh in their face when they spout their crap. They are doing their job, but I found that they DO blatantly lie and deny knowledge of letters/emails etc.....they leave you alone for a while to think you have it sorted then pop up again later. I am expecting a letter from them confirming my account is closed but I shall save millions of copies just in case. I don't trust them not to pop up again in a few years still trying it on. Power to the people and ma
  6. UPDATE** I have today received an email from the council tax manager Thankyou for your e mail of 23 July 2013 regarding the above. My apologies for not responding earlier but I was on leave until today. I have reviewed all the correspondence you have sent to both ourselves and Rossendales. As a result I have instructed Rossendales to cancel both the levy and van attendance fee. I agree that the vehicle was subject to finance at the time of the levy, the document you sent to Rossendales at the end of June 2013 confirms the same. As the fees incurred by the bailiff have now re
  7. Incidentally, dont know how relevant this is....(I may have dreamt but is there some kind of ruling that fees cannot be more than initial LO) This was for £106 that I overlooked
  8. I do use it for social as well. For work I have to drive anywhere in yorkshire with 40 loaves of bread, a box of dough, 40 aprons/baking trays/hairnets etc etc......the only way i could continue is with a hire car. turbo went on my beastie and everyone joked that I should cycle with a trailer, but that is not going to get me wakefield to sheffield by 10am with a 9am start lol......appreciate the info edited to add: its insured sdp and business use with one driver....ME
  9. Ploddertom, do you know what criteria is used to define 'tools of trade?' I could not possibly do my job without my car, is that not sufficient? :/
  10. I emailed and posted an 'official' complaint when they first came back out of the woodwork about 2 months ago. Sent to rossendales and copied council and local MP in. Never got any acknowledgement from the MP. Council recently wrote back with a statement outlining what I had been charged and saying it was out of their hands. Rossendales deny all knowledge then after an email (seems to be the only thing they acknowledge) stated that in their opinion BECAUSE the finance was paid up (or should have been) las Nov then it was a valid levy. Levy was in 2010 lol..........Emailed them statement from
  11. Just done that. Also my MP (again lol) If they have all had the paperwork then they SHOULD lift the levy. Should I say, here goes another round of arguing lol! Thanks for the input peeps, will update as and when
  12. I need them to accept and agree it was an invalid levy. I suspect they will continue to argue until it IS paid off then take it
  13. Ah, thats interesting Jospephbloggs! Basically then, they are believing it to be a valid levy. (even though it wasnt) So when I do pay the car off can they come and take it then? How long do I have to worry about this? Sheesh!!
  14. Have just spoken to the finance company and they state that under no circumstances would they authorise ANYONE to remove the car from my possession. So, bully boys scare tactics are NOT going to work. Emailed them. I have proof all all emails sent and can print to show whoever. Dont trust them with written snail mail as they ignore you to lull you into a false sense of security then creep out of the woodwork later, when all the bits of paper are misplaced GRRRRRRRRRRR :/
  15. Other question, is the levy not supposed to be to cover the LO, which is cleared? This is them threatening to take the car just for their fees.
  • Create New...