This topic was closed on 03/07/19. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group

i had success in my previous case and now have the unfortunate problem of being charged £50.00 for going over my overdraft by £40.00 for two days!!! what do i do from here. do i go through the whole process again? i have phoned the bank and suggested that they don't charge me as i have been refunded in the past, but all i get is we will look into it.

I would just like to thank everyone that has helped with my thread, case closed!!! lets just say i'm happy

Right, claim posted today, let's see how it goes. I'll keep everyone in the loop!

Right the 14 days are over so i am busy with my moneyclaim, Wow i didn't realise these things could be so confusing, i have removed the temporary overdraft set up fees and included my latest fee and started with my claim, now two problems, 1) i can't get the details of the claim below 25 lines (it has to be 24 to go through) and i want to make sure it is ok. here it is I have a contract with HSBC dated March 2003 and which is conducted on their standard terms and conditions. I am claiming the return of money taken by HSBC in the way of charges over the last 03 years plus the interest they have levied on those charges. The Bank's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair(Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2 (1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. I have repeatedly asked the bank to justify their charges but they have declined to do so.The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from March 2003 to 19-04-2006 of £112.32 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of 0.022%. please let me know if this is ok, thanks

Right the 14 days is up from the 2nd letter, i am going to download and fill in the 8% spreadsheet, there is just a couple of things i need to clear up before i submit my claim. I understand that i can claim for going over my overdraft fees, can i also claim against the interest they charge me at tha same time? also temporary overdraft limit fees of £20.00 every time they set up a temporary overdraft? also charges for recalling a standing order? also stopped cheque charges, i'm hoping somebody can clear this up for me, i'm also wondering whether or not i should open up a 2nd account??? thanks for any help

right, had my 3rd letter back from HSBC (Phil Beaumont) it reads as follows: Dear Mr XXXXXXX Ref: XXXXXXXXXX thank you for your further letter i can confirm that the bank's position has been clearly stated in our letter dated 27 march 2006. this letter constituted our final response with regard to this matter and advised that should you remain unsatisfied you have the option to refer to the financial ombudsman service as detailed in the leaflet provided. yours sincerely phil beaumont senior service quality officer Well fancy that another standard response, do i still wait the 14 days or do i start the moneyclaim now??? thanks for any responses as i'm getting a bit confused as nobody else i've read about seems to have received this letter

Still waioting for a reply from HSBC regarding my 2nd letter, got my statement for this month and they are going to charge me £125.00 this month, it's ridiculous!!!! I haven't included this amount in the amount i am claiming back, can i add it on later???

Right 2nd letters sent out 1 to my branch and one to Mr Phil Beaumont in Leeds, here's hoping!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks for that, do i send a letter to my branch and to the person that sent me the 2nd letter?

Hi, I did my first letter to HSBC on the 14th March 2006, they responded with the standard 1st letter stating that they are looking into matters and will contact me with a full response as soon as they have completed their investigations. They also included a copy of their leaflet that explains how their matters are dealt with. This letter was pp'd on behalf of David L Johnson who seems to be the Customer Service Officer. Looked on this site and found out that this is a standard letter, so i thought i will wait until the 14 days are through and then take the 2nd step. I received a 2nd letter today which also seems to be standard, it says that they thank me for my letter that requested a refund of all my bank charges since March 2003 (which totals £1308.10) it says that the bank does not agree with my contention that the charges are unlawful and are therefore unenforceable. it says that the contract between the bank and its customers is governed by their personal banking terms and conditions. It says that i should take note of clause 7.11 in section 2. It finishes saying that i will not be happy with the outcome of the letter and if i am not satisfied i should refer my complaint to the financial ombudsman service, as this is their final response on this matter. What now, should i carry on with this claim? Is this the correct time to contact the moneyclaim site? if so is this when i calculate my claim with 8%? what is the chance of me succeeding with this claim? and what re the chances with the bank closing my account? Any response will be greatly appreciated as i'm a bit confused, thanks