Jump to content

Thailand

Banned
  • Posts

    2,250
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Thailand

  1. Yes, that was the post that wound me up so (and your comments thereafter). Why are you apologising? Do you think that your misgivings over statute excuse you? The point is, law or no law, you shouldn't think that way. Fine, we're all human - but my word did your post lack any merit. Yes, I have to say that I am gay to show my understanding - but this was taken out of context and it was also inferred I was on some kind of gay mission. No matter, thank you for your apology.

     

    Theresa May is a w*nker - end of that discussion, and don't compare yourself to her.

     

    Yes, Monx's post was spot on! keyword 'parity' added to one's dictionary. :D

  2. Fred, I know from where you commeth. Know that religion is even more 'lose-lose'

     

    Doesn't mean it shouldn't be discussed - it's all hot air and excuses pandering around offence - this is why I don't mind people disliking gays (yep, I still have an opinion about it but I really understand people's fears*)

     

    * N.b...I have no fear of religion. :D

     

    *bites tongue with the religious bit*

  3. I'd like you to point out to me ANY reference I've made to gays on this or any other thread. To be honest, I've followed my own advice and kept well away from this subject entirely, until I read your post.

     

    I've done the same Fred, more than you know. My point was aimed at your agreeance with AC/DD...it never stops and I understand that.

     

    Look, I don't disrespect you Fred, so we must agree to disagree. My posts aren't quite clear, in fairness, and you should know I don't have any 'gay agenda' I just know, in my heart, what displays of bigotry I have witnessed, Now and prior.

     

    What irks me most, tbh, is AC's disgraceful comment about young homosexuals, yes, it was that bad. I can't even think as to how I might address that ridiculous comment. So, my back is up and I may have wandered off one one a touch. That is why.

     

    Still waiting for your approval of large scale expenditure in austere times. Sauce for the goose. (AC)

     

    And I do not see myself as a victim!! If you knew me better you'd also laugh at that! I also agree with your last sentence (since I was not thinking that way).

     

    In any case, I think my earlier comment was a touch rude - therefore I apologise, but I don't think you know where I am coming from. I also appreciate people's comments, but we, as a race, don't always agree, innit. :)

  4. You and DD/AC should marry, Fred. I know, I know... Mrs Bassett would be let down and we'd live in a scary world, but whatever.

     

    I think you'll find it is you that is ranting.

     

    Did you realise your first sentence made sense! It isn't rocket science. I hold, as you do, that discussing gays is not fit for the layman. Bigoted laymen. 'Twisted and turned' dream on, and I called no-one a gay basher (I realise it sort of seems that way - but it is not my intention, rather it is what has been said historically that winds me up)

     

    Do you really think I'm that way out? Rights for gays etc? NO. I just don't see the reason for bringing it up - pure and simple. As for refering to my post - you crack me up. sarcasm being your tool - oh, maybe not...but what other excuse have you got?

     

    It may have escaped YOUR attention, Fred, but there has been rather large displays of all factions of bigotry on this thread, and yes, I'm sensitive to the gay nonsense spouted on here and on threads that preceeded it.

     

    Stuff your gay suffering, fool, that's just YOUR take on it.

  5. But then I am, again, guessing because I didn't want to read it. I'm human. The same way Catholics, like yourself, don't read the Irish reports of child rape/torture because the truth potentially hurts. You know, criminal abuse in the name of religion (It's lost on you...don't fret)

     

    I'm not sure there is a parallel there, but I didn't read it for some reason...guessing really.

  6. No, I do not go of the deep end. Whilst I confess it reads that way, it is what has been said previously that sticks.

     

    I am not, in the slightest, referring to David Laws.

     

    I posted that link up on facebook many hours before it turned up here - and TBH, I didn't read it (flatmate told me about it).

     

    My comments, again!, are nothing to do with that and I echo a previous comment (Bookie, I think) that said something along the lines of 'his homosexuality is no excuse' it certainly is not.

  7. This site is a white label website owned by *forgets name - begins with 'S'* It is basically Greasypalm and should be avoided like the plague. Stick to the mother of all cashback sites; Topcashback. Failing that quidco. :D

     

    Though Cashbackkings is OK amongst others (avoid wepromiseto an all! another Greasypalm poor CS crock - 100% CB it might be, but the affiliate rates blow chunks and don't get me started on their CS)

  8. They don't want their personal lives all over the red tops - just like most heterosexual couples wouldn't want it either.

     

    Oooohhh, inference inference - ignoramus.

     

    Oh, hark at you again. :rolleyes: I know you'll get away with excuses, but I got you pinned.

     

    Just WTF do you mean by this (as if I don't know). Some gay people just get on with their lives? Smacks a little of your pathetic assertions aimed at me, what with you being a clever little sausage. You make sweeping general assumptions about people and you are UNAWARE of it. You infer, deny it or not, that the gays YOU like don't do such things - but you are talking out of your behind. Are you an expert or what? Are YOU gay? Oh, no, probably not, you just know best.

     

    I can smell where you are coming from and it sucks....know nothing/big opinion. 'Ooohh I've got gay friends, so I'm clued up' jesus - I bet you don't really know them. The whole gay thing is irrelevant, so stop making parallels. You should you're clearly wrong. It is ALMOST as bad as AC's disgusting '16 is too young' embarrassing post (another that knows best).

     

    Eejits.

     

    You need to understand why you say 'some gay people'. Yes, that's fine in itself, why not, but you have personally given me the whole 'holier than thou' rubbish in defining your ill-conceived assumptions about me, and you are at it again miss knownufink. You know nothing about it, so keep your rubbish to yourself - free speech - ok, but I won't see that go unnoticed.

     

    Say a prayer for me, lmFAO. :D

     

    Now - I need 15 million so I have an athiest parrrrtaayyyyy, AC will allow it (avoidance of question taken as gospel) can I have it??

     

    Off topic, I know, but fun all the same. I'm thinking we need est. cira 5 Billion to make sure we all get to celebrate stuff...cough up!

     

    Assuming you are a taxpayer of course, otherwise I'll have to seek my permissions elswhere.

×
×
  • Create New...