Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About scorpio_manuk

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. This topic was closed on 09 March 2019. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group
  2. This topic was closed on 2019-03-08. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group
  3. Reload, What I did was add the words as previously advised as a belt and braces operation still sent letter 1 and 2 14 and 28 days. But as well on advice I got in contact with Compliance (Thats the department that oversees all the operations of the bank to make sure that all legislation and regulation is adhered to) They do not make their phone numbers/address readly available but found it on Usenet sites so got in touch. They are not jobs worth people and will listern to whats said and have brains and clout to boot. They can overrule any department in the bank except audit which i
  4. The Magic letter is vertulay the same as the DPA request but amended to include the wording. I also require copies of all invoices raised for any services or charges provided by the bank to me. Simple addition that makes all the difference. The bank is obliged to provide an invoice (uniquely numbered etc etc) detailing services provided (even if VAT exempt) the dont send them so cannot disclose them. If they send any then you can request a full break down of the costs of ther service. They are hung both ways dont give them them HMC&E on their backs along with DPA. Then follow thr
  5. Yes Iagree before you post check the threads, I have detailed how I did it in another thread. A simple addition to the DPA request and then straight to compiance department pure and simple no Service recovery department which means loss prevention department. Not rocket science. I cannot agree with you more about proffesional advice, from the standard of advice from forum moderators and their ability to understand issues you should add look at other sites and see what is currently working as well with little or no cost to yourselves. The bubble will burst on this method as sure as eggs are egg
  6. Hi Stacymason, The company is not registed at companies house, I have spoken to them as well as checking on line. Also as a general enquiry the say that they would have expected them to be for limited liability cover, tax advantages, Etc, Etc. I agree with what you say as being inappropaiate Etc. Bear in mind that the banks all use so called "debt collection companies" which in reality are in house debt collection staff. Kind Regards, Scorpio_manuk.
  7. Law society state that they beleive its a trading style and under DPA act they can not disclose who owns the company. Kind Regards, Scorpio_manuk.
  8. Yep whats your turn over a year, what do you think theirs is way above the limit also for VAT registraion purposes ETC. All address lead to Lloyds TSB offices. Also check out on the web search all hits on solicitors and you will find every one is Lloyds TSB or client based. Kind regards, Malcolm Reffell.
  9. Reload, Its all Lloydish addresses for the different divisions they act for. You cannot escape they are not a registered company in the UK ETC Etc. Regardless of legal partnership they have to be registered to trade in the UK. I can understand you lossing interest especially when you dont want to admit whats stareing you in the face well people will draw their own conclusions on this as the facts speak for themselves. Kind Regards, Scorpio_manuk
  10. Thanks for that, thats the Lloyds Collection centre address they quote. As I said before its a trading style only not a registered independant company. Kind Regards, Scorpio_manuk.
  11. "I can find absolutely no information on the companies house site about a company named Sechiari, Clarke and Mitchell. If anyone can come forward with a registered address and/or registered company number, it'd help. However, Waterlow legal - Your gateway to legal advice, forms, services, documents, aid and help has 4 seperate offices of Sechiari Clark & Mitchell listed. The Brighton address is identical to that of Lloyd's Brighton collection centre 1 - 9 Brighton place. Although this does not necessarily mean Lloyds pay their wages directly; they could quite easily be working out of t
  12. Relaod, Before shooting off the hip any more go to the companies house web site use the free service for checking on companies both PLC and Limited and put the name of the solicitors in and then post the results to this site. If you then what to enter into a genuine storming session to get people their money back quicker then I will do so. Court costs of £250 to issue and alloction fees of £100 have been repeatly posted on tis site thats how £350 is arrived at. Kind regards, Scorpio_manuk
  13. Dappa44, What I did was very simple and what I would recomend to everyone. I looked and all the money claiming back sites and looked at what was working and what was not, worked my plan of action out with bits from all. Got a friend who is a qualified solicitor who does free work for the Citizens advice to give it the once over for good measure and it worked for me with out issuing court proceeding there are loads of other people out their that have won with out issuing proceedings even now. You just have to be one step ahead of the game with the banks before they block the route
  14. Barracad, You have shown yourself to be rather silly in locking the thread and a complete lack of knowledge of the law along with reload, others will see this as well. Simply read whats there admit you have no knowledge about this matter and let others try to get there money back in a quicker manner than they are now. The banks are beginging to hit back now and the glouster court thread of stays someone put it in the judges mind about Lloyds going to take a few cases to court to try and set presidence which was their sloicitors not rocket science to work out. So if their is a wa
  15. Barracad, The point being if you read things carefully this time is that they are Lloyds employees not Sechiari so when you get the court forms they show as acting on behalf this is missleading as they are employees of and the box should be left blank simple !!! You should never assume anything when in litigation if you make one mistake they will get your claim struck out. So what good for them is good for us they make a mistake and they get struck out !!!> Not being funny or wishing to start a bun fight but have you had any lay or formal law training Barracad for giving advice here ???.
  • Create New...