Jump to content

Dizzy21

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

483 profile views
  1. Thanks Lee - I thought that was the case having searched the forum but I'm just stressed out at the moment and not thinking straight. Your response is much appreciated.
  2. Hi Guys, I've now received a further 4 letters from DRP since my last post in sept but ignored all. However, I'm not sure if I was right to ignore. I have attached the latest letter and the first after my last post. The latest letter was received on 5th Nov. Can you advise how I should respond to this what appears to be final letter before taking me to court. I could do without any hassle as I'm not in the right mind set at the moment Many thanks in advance for your help. Additional Info Just for clarity - Page 1&2 is the last letter received, page 3 & 4 were sent 15/9 and received 20/9 and was immediately following the letter uploaded previously. All of the letters are similar but with subtle changes. I can upload these if you think it may be relevant. The changes mainly appear on the Pay now page and involve an increase to the number of payment deadlines that have passed and a change on the 2nd page on case monitoring activity e.g eligible to legal activity in the earlier letters to now stating Terminal contact. The frequency of the letters also appears to have moved from monthly to fortnightly. terminal contact 6Nov 21.pdf
  3. Hi Folks, I received the attached demand from Debt Recovery, I suspect around 20/8/21 but due to death in family I didn't do anything with it as more pressing matters. I'm not sure if this is the letter I respond to with a snotty letter or if I just ignore. Your advice as usual will be greatly appreciated - head is all over the place at the moment so sorry if you've told me the answer before. 2021-08-18 DR+ chasing.pdf
  4. Hi all, now received a request for £130 as I ignored the original parking invoice after they rejected my appeal. Am I correct in assuming that I just ignore this like I should have done with the original Parking invoice?
  5. Yes - received in an email this week - . Thank you for your recent communication. I have noted the points you raised and would like to confirm that we are cancelling the Parking Charge Notice. If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely, Smart Parking Ltd
  6. Hi All, Just to let you know - they have cancelled this parking charge. Thanks for all the advice Dizzy
  7. Homer67, Is this fact important and what if the keeper was the driver would that then negate any possible defence? Sorry if these are simple questions, as been reading as many posts as I can to get up to speed but still a bit wet behind the ears. I also thought of contacting Smart park to request a release of all subject data information they hold using Data protection laws to obtain. I also found an article in the local press re planning permission for signage - although it referred to Parking eye and not Smart Park but not sure how to check if planning permission was obtained Any information that anyone can supply would be much appreciated. Thanks All
  8. Thanks so much for coming back so quickly. Can I just check the Q&A thread- Inthought I’d included on page 1 of the PDF. Is there an additional q&a? thanks again for all your help - I’m slowly educating myself!
  9. 1.Date of the infringement 15th June 2021 2.Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 28th June 2021 3. Date received 1 July 2021 (I think) 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/a 7 Who is the parking company? Smart Parking Ltd 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Angouleme Way, Retail Park Bury 9. There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE. Think it’s BPA For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Independent Adjudication Service (POPLA) Hi folks - seeking help for my elderly parents on what appears to have been a nightmare trip. Started a separate thread to my gateway house PCN thread FOR CLARITY. Parents are late 70's/80's. Parked at retail park and displayed blue badge which entitled them to 45 mins free parking without ticket. Arrived 14:39:57 Exited 15:35:30 Shopped at TK.Maxx but didn't keep receipts. Slight medical emergency but nothing other than each other to collaborate and historical medical records might confirm. They are worried about ignoring and want to consider appealing. I know that is not best course of action from my own situation. From reading previous threads - could they appeal on 14 day notice to registered keeper rule : Supposed Contravention 15/6/21. Date of letter 28/6/21 which would suggest 13 days but wasn't received in the post until 1st July 2021 which is in excess of 16 days? They want to appeal on medical grounds which was there reason for their 10/12 min overstay as they had to find toilet and not the quickest movers. Any advice greatly received PCN 150621.pdf
  10. I've tried to upload all the details in one PDF but it keeps rejecting and says parking.pdf I think I've managed to upload now and I will research over the weekend as per your suggestion 1 Date of the infringement 16/06/212 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 18/06/213 Date received 19/06/214 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Y but not schedule 4 instead it states Made under the Protection of Freedom Act 20125 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Yes Have you had a response? [Y/N?] Yes 7 Who is the parking company? UKCPS 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Gateway House Piccadilly, Manchester For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. UKCPS and IAS
  11. Incident happened on 16th June. Driving to pre-booked parking but road closures on Ducie street and needed to turn around as couldn't go in the direction requested by sat nav. Turned into 1st road on left which was Gateway house, didn't realise it was private land and didn't see notices. Couldn't U-turn as car behind and barrier ahead - pulled over for safety to let cars enter what was a car park. Noticed people entering station. Re-programmed my sat nav to find the correct car park at Piccadilly Place, allowed my passengers to get out as didn't know how far I was from my car park - this was not the original intention to drop passengers off but it seemed sensible since we were in the right area and my parents are elderly. I didn't leave the car, u-turned and exited to find my car park which was less than 1 minute away on foot. Wasn't in the private ground for anymore than 4/5 mins max. Their cameras show 4 pictures timed at 10:09:09 to 10:10:31. I appealed the initial PCN explaining road closures, genuine error and sent copies of my pre-booked parking, train tickets etc and of passengers disembarking. Received response today rejecting but offering discounted price £60 for 14 days but if I opted to appeal to independent appeal service and they rejected the fine would be £100. One of the pictures does show signage but it was 20 feet at least from the car and I didn't notice it at the time nor could I have read all the details in the time I spent there as I was more focussed on re-setting the sat nav I know now I shouldn't have appealed the original notice and that I gave them too much detail but I genuinely thought honest was the best policy. Is it worth appealing to the IAS or should I just pay up
×
×
  • Create New...