Jump to content

PoolerBoy

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    93
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PoolerBoy

  1. Hi DX i had the court date letter yesterday for end of July. Witness statement due 14th so I will be putting it together soon. Your advice will be appreciated as I can’t see many of these multiple claim posts.
  2. Yes but same bunch in my book. All disgusting bullies. The call them a sister company on their website and all my letters had “as seen on tv can’t pay we’ll take it away” on them.
  3. Hi Everyone A quick update from me… Many of you know about my court case being instigated by first the car parking company at Magor Services, then the bailiffs at DCBL aka “Can’t Pay We’ll Take It Away”. I’ve gone through the full process now and was listed to appear at Blackwood County Court on Wednesday next week at 10:00. I’ve always maintained I paid to park and have never owed this money. I fought every step of the way but neither would listen. My evidence was submitted and when the bully bailiffs saw it they had the cheek to offer me a reduction to £150 to “reduce costs”… theirs. I had the court move from an online hearing to an in person so they would now need to drive from Manchester to Blackwood by 10am. My reply was I don’t owe it, I’ve never owed it and provided evidence… the bank statement my payment came out of in…. January 2018… 4 years ago, so either discontinue it or see you Wednesday. Had a letter from DCBL just now…. Claim discontinued. Now for my claim for false access to my personal details and breaking GDPR REGS. Never get bullied by these idiots folks. Thanks to the admins that advised as I went. You are all fantastic. How do I go about the GDPR claim? thank you all so much.
  4. Thanks both. I don’t have the phone or account as I changed number a short while ago. But I will mention something in it. I will riddicule as you say the one part. can you tell me how the establishment of driver bit is out of line with PoFA tho, I’m clueless. Thanks.
  5. The court emailed DCBL last night asking if they object to in person not online. Im guessing they will so is it their call?
  6. Here you go, I think its fully redacted. The signage is old ones, I can never remeber it being £10 so must pre date at least 2015. They seem to be going down contract route as PoFA not mentioned. Also, I have never told them who the driver was so contract cannot be established surely? WS Bundle DCBL-redacted-compressed.pdf
  7. Anyone use a useful tool to reduce the size please? Im ready to upload it but its too big!!
  8. Yes I will Dave. The notice doesn’t mention the PoFA so I’m guessing they are going down the contract route. I’ve never told them if I was driving either. Also, the epic of signage they have used is a charge of £10 but the actual charge was £12 so I’m guessing old signage from ages ago.
  9. I’ve received their WS today. The alleged offence was 31-12-17 and the ticket was issued 1-2-18. That’s over a month. Isn’t that out of time anyway? I thought it had to be issued within 14 days?
  10. Just spoke to my local court on the phone. I've requested this hearing to be in person. Make these clowns turn up. She said judges want things to go back in person so it may be possible. We will see.
  11. another one from them calling to bring the claim to an "amicable solution" lol
  12. Thanks honeybee, I've done this but I struggled to find a WS one. I've found one now so I'm just drafting my first part.
  13. I was about to post that my hearing is 13th April. Got a letter this morning. Its an online one but I would prefer in person but I guess its not my choice is it? My WS needs to be served by 31st March.
  14. Just had an answerphone message from Overdales wishing to speak to me regarding the documents they recently sent.....Ummmmmmm no chance. the cheek of them
  15. Morning Guys I've received a response from Overdales to the CPR and S78 request. I've attached a redacted PDF for you to have a look at. It seems the Very DN is no longer available but they have sent some really odd looking "Teletext" document instead. The Vanquis statements are just bare A4 printouts not actual proper statements. The other Vanquis doc is only the alleged application with no IP address or anything else. Thanks Overdales response to CPR Very part of it.pdf
  16. Cabot said they have taken it back from MC who were actioning it. Does that read better?
  17. Hi all Just this second had a letter from Cabot saying they have removed their claim from Mortimer Clarke and no further action or attempts will be made to collect on it. I knew they had nothing. Thanks again for your help on this one. They will continue to report it though. Shame we cant get them removed from the CRA file.
×
×
  • Create New...