well it looks like people are wrong here and i am confused as why i took so long to get a simple answer (and just beating around the bush) and as per PP they normally cancel on first appeal when challange.....
From PP forum
9 (2) (a) No period of parking. Moving in front of a camera, by definition, is not parking.
9 (2) (e) Invitation to keeper is not there in the required format
9 (2) (f) Notice of keeper liability is incorrect.
Here's POFA: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9...edule/4/enacted
I have just received your Notice to Keeper No. xxxxx for vehicle VRM xxxx
You have failed to comply with the requirements of Schedule 4 of The Protection Of Freedoms Act 2012 namely, but not limited to, failing to give notice of keeper liability as prescribed by section 9 (2) (f) of the Act. You cannot, therefore, transfer liability for the alleged charge from the driver at the time to me, the keeper.
There is no legal requirement to name the driver at the time and I will not be doing so.
I do not expect to hear from you again, or your debt collectors, except to confirm that no further action will be taken on this matter and my personal details have been removed from your records.
First class post with free certificate of posting from a post office.
The other POFA fails will go into the POFA appeal if required.