Jump to content

acidliam

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About acidliam

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Hi all. I've attached what was my first letter from Smart, didn't get an NTK in the first place. Emailed in from this asking for more details, no admission of driver etc. Didn't get a satisfactory response so ignored everything up to the recent shoddy LBC See below: 1 The date of infringement? 29th October 2019 2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] Only asked for more details via website as NTK wasn't received and informed Smart that multiple drivers have access to car and 2 drivers use same carpark. if you have then please post up
  2. Absolutely no issue with writing arsey letters, its a pastime of mine. Just want to make sure its solid! In terms of docs I didn't actually get a NTK as they'd sent it to an old address, the appeal would have simply asked for more info re photos via the form on the smart parking site (I'm certain I saved the copy somewhere) and the only other communication was a reply saying it was over 28 days so they wouldn't send. Will scan and upload what I have shortly.
  3. I have received a letter from CST Law, instructed by DRP - the agent of Smart Parking Limited. The letter before claim is in relation to a parking charge issued in October 2019. The parking charge is in relation to parking in a Smart Parking Ltd car park which was used when visiting a gym. The gym issued free parking providing a correct reg plate was inputed into a meter within the gym, which may or may have not happened at the time of this alleged charge. Both my partner and I have access to the car in question, and both used the same gym multiple times per week.
×
×
  • Create New...