Jump to content

BattleShipII

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About BattleShipII

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Hi, Letter received from MCS today - thoughts on whether to check with Court. I've read some posts on here whereby these cretins have done this before and won because of the defendant not carrying on as normal without formal documentation from the court. Shall I continue as normal / phone the court for advice? "We confirm we have received your defence. We have referred the content of your defence to our client for their comments, we will come back to you as soon as we have our clients instructions. This may take some time, especially if our clien
  2. Hi, this is the amended and hopefully final defence. Would someone just give it a once over for me before it's ready for filing on MCOL. I'm doubting myself but as I recall I don't need to post to the Sols or Claimant, just submit online? Particulars of claim for reference only 1.By an agreement between New Day re Fluid Mastercard & the Defendant on or around 01/03/2019 ("the agreement") New Day re Fluid Mastercard agreed to issue the Defendant with a credit card. 2.The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due. 3.The Agreement was te
  3. Just received this from MCS. "We have received your request for documents under the Civil Procedure Rule 31.14. We have sent your request to our client and will back to you when we have heard back from them. Our client may not have all the documents to hand, they may need to ask the original creditor for some of the documents so it may take some time for us to come back to you. We trust this is of assistance to you." As I recall it's the usual waffle from these cretins, are they not supposed to be in possession of documents before filing with MCO
  4. Hopefully this is a little better. I know I have time but I now work for an airline and I'm away somewhere hot for 7 days. Just trying to get as much done in the time I have. DEFENCE 1. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC 2. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant acc
  5. This is my defence so far, nicked from various other defences. Someone give it a once over for me pls. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5(3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. The Defendant notes the opening sentence referring to an agreement with New Day. The Defendant has in the past had financial dealings with New Day. The Defendant is unaware of what alleged debt the Claimant refers, having failed to adequately particularise its claim, the particulars of claim are vague a
  6. Just so I don't make a mistake - my defence needs to be submitted by 03/11/2020 by 4pm?
  7. AoS done today. Defend All ticked. CCA and CPR will be sent tomorrow as per instructions.
  8. Name of the Claimant ? Cabot Financial UK Ltd Date of issue – 02/10/2020 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – 1.By an agreement between New Day re Fluid Mastercard & the Defendant on or around 01/03/2019 ("the agreement") New Day re Fluid Mastercard agreed to issue the Defendant with a credit card. 2.The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due. 3.The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice. 4.The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant. THE CLAIMANT
  9. Hi, I've received a Claim Form from Northampton County Court. Claimant: Cabot Financial Limited Solicitors: Mortimer Clarke Solicitors Ltd Particulars of Claim: By an agreement between New Day re Fluid Mastercard & the Defendant on or around 01/03/2019 ("the agreement") New Day re Fluid Mastercard agreed to issue the Defendant with a credit card. The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due. The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice. The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant. THE CLAIMANT THERE
×
×
  • Create New...