Jump to content

Chipster1!

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chipster1!

  1. Thank you so much FTM Dave and all other comments. All typed up and ready to go. This is it........... CST Law 5 Rutland Court 161 Rutland Road Sheffield S3 9PP Claimant Euro Car Parks LTD PCN Number Dear unemployed law graduate reduced to signing letters for Credit Style". I am in receipt of your letter dated the 4th June 2021 and have noted its contents. You state you are instructed by Euro Car Parks to commence legal action and have entitled your letter a Letter Before Claim. Unfortunately for you I cannot accept this shoddily thrown together piece of tripe to be a LBC as it fails miserably to come anywhere near a LBC as required under the revised Civil Procedure Regulations and so would expect a court to summarily dismiss any claim later made by you or your client on that basis. However, as you are the parking worlds third worst firm of ‘solicitors’, I am not surprised you failed to put any effort into this taradiddle, so, to make sure that there is no misunderstanding, I deny that any monies are owed to your client by myself as there is precedent case law that your clients greed and commercially unjustifiable claim amount has blinded them to. The inflated amount of the claim, the POFA and contract law are very clear on this point and again plenty of examples of dismissed claims are in the public domain. You direct me to paragraph 2.1 © of the PAP which obliges the parties to act reasonably and proportionately, well all I can say to that is “how dare you”! It would be wise if you took your obligations you signed up to when being entered onto the SRA roll and advised your clients it is not in their interests to continue with this matter as they have no cause for action and I shall seek a full costs recover order for any civil claim made under the unreasonableness criteria. Copied to Euro Car Parks.
  2. Thank you Brassneck, much appreciated. Shall I send or wait for Ericsbrother or a few more opinions?
  3. Good morning everyone, This is what I have come up with so far and thank you to Ericsbrother for the majority from a previous post......... CST Law 5 Rutland Court 161 Rutland Road Sheffield S3 9PP Claimant Euro Car Parks LTD PCN Number Dear CST ‘Law’ Team I am in receipt of your letter dated the 4th June 2021 and have noted its contents. You state you are instructed by Euro Car Parks to commence legal action and have entitled your letter a Letter Before Claim. Unfortunately for you I cannot accept this shoddily thrown together piece of tripe to be a LBC as it fails miserably to come anywhere near a LBC as required under the revised Civil Procedure Regulations and so would expect a court to summarily dismiss any claim later made by you or your client on that basis. However, as you are the parking worlds third worst firm of solicitors, I am not surprised you failed to put any effort into this taradiddle, so, to make sure that there is no misunderstanding, I deny that any monies are owed to your client by myself as there is precedent case law that your clients greed and commercially unjustifiable claim amount has blinded them to. The inflated amount of the claim, the POFA and contract law are very clear on this point and again plenty of examples of dismissed claims are in the public domain. You direct me to paragraph 2.1 © of the PAP which obliges the parties to act reasonably and proportionately, well I can say to that is “how dare you”! It would be wise if you took your obligations you signed up to when being entered onto the SRA roll and advised your clients it is not in their interests to continue with this matter as they have no cause for action and I shall seek a full costs recover order for any civil claim made under the unreasonableness criteria.
  4. Thanks HB and thank you FTMDave. No I'm not close, 40 odd mile away. Just not sure where to start with this. I've been daft enough to ID myself and I've been looking at other snotty letters but havent found one yet but yes I'll send up what I come up with. Thanks again
  5. Yes, I was genuinley blocked in, its a tiny car park and someone just took a chance. I said 11 mins as I have been informed that everyone gets a 10mins window when entering a car park. Thank you for your advice. I'll search snotty letters. Just hope I'm doing the right thing. Thank you again
  6. 1 Date of the infringement 12/11/2019 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 19/11/2019 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please do not put JPG Picture files into your post 3 Date received 2nd December 2020 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Pictures of my licence plate 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Yes Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Yes 7 Who is the parking company? Euro Car Parks 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Wellington Street, Stockport For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. In writing to ECP, 30 Dorset Square, London then if unsuccessful I could appeal to POPLA. They state POPLA won't accept an appeal unless I go through ECP first. There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here An Appeals Rejection Letter. A 2nd Appeals Rejection Letter Final Notification Letter 3 Debt Recovery Plus Letters CST Law Letter Reminder Notice Thank you very much for looking at this for me. docs1.pdf
  7. Dear Consumer Action Group Please could you advise me what my next step should be please? I have gone through the whole process with these people over 18 months and it has now come to a Letter Before Claim from them. I purchased my ticket at 9.18am. They are trying to charge me £ 170.00 for overstaying 10mins 34 secs. I wrote to them using the stencil stating mitigating circumstances and the charge is disproportionate and not commercially justifiable but they have pursued me anyway. I have attached all correspondence for you. Thank you for any help you are able to give. docs1.pdf
  8. Thank you so much FTMDave, I wish I could take credit!! I just wanted to make sure I had the context right. You peeps on here are bloody marvelous. Will post it tomorrow and will make sure I get the certificate of posting I hope they leave me alone after this
  9. Ok and thank you very much for all the time, effort and input you have all given me. You are all genius's!! I am going to get on and type the letter back to them, so exciting!! I'll let you all know what happens next, if anything........
  10. Ooooh sounds fantastic to me but as we know, I know nowt!! Thank you so much for your efforts and I'll hang fire until you tell me to go for it.
  11. I had to cut & paste, I'm not very technical, enjoy! He wrote:- would respond to this. Start wth dear sirs, I am in receipt of your letter dated the 31st October 2017 and have noted its contents. You state that I should consider this to be a letter before action or letter before claim. Unfortunately for you I cannot accept this shoddily thrown together piece of tripe to be a LBA as it fails miserably to come anywhere near a lba as required under the revised Civil Procedure Regulations and so would expect a court to summarily dismiss any claim later made by you or your client on that basis. However as you are the parking world third worst firm of solicitors I am not surprised you failed to put any effort into this taradiddle so to make sure that there is no misunderstanding I deny that any monies are owed to your client by myself as there is precedent case law that your clients greed has blindeed them to. The same applies to the inflated amount of the claim, the POFA and contract law are very clear on this point and again plenty of examples of dismissed claims are in the public domain. Your fondness for misquoting the decision of PE v Beavis makes it look like you have never read the full judgement but like the other rent a threats see it as a panacea for justifying any old coddswallop you care to trot out It would be wise if you took your obligations you signed up to when being entered onto the SRA roll and advised your clients it is not in their interests to continue with this matter as they have no cause for action and I shall seek a full costs recover order for any civil claim made under the unreasonableness criteria. Do not be polite to these bandits. Dont forget, you can use the letter you send as evidence should they then continue Edited November 20, 2017 by honeybee13 Paras
  12. Oh god, I'm sorry guys, I'm totally new to all this, I thought I'd obscured enough The date of Letter Before Claim was 18th June but I only received it Friday 10th July.
  13. Thanks D. This has got me all of a dither I feel very naive, I thought common sense would rule the day! docs1.pdf
  14. 1 Date of the infringement 24th May 2019 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Never received one. [scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] 3 Date received Never received one. 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N/A 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Yes Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Yes 7 Who is the parking company? Smart Parking 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Medtia Square Oldham Manchester For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here 2 Letters from Debt Recovery Plus LTD. 2 letters Debt Recovery Plus (they have different letterheads & designs). 2 letters from Zenith Collections and 2 letters from CST Law. I tried to attach all of the letters as one multi page PDF as you requested but it wont let me. Says there is a limit of 4.88. Shall I send them individually? And thank you very much for your time and help I made a compressed zip file but it wont let me attache that either.
  15. Dear Consumer Group Can anyone help me please? I have received a Letter Before Claim for an outstanding amount of £185.00 I paid for my time in the car park but entered two of my registration digits in the wrong order. I appealed immediately to Smart Parking as it was blatantly obvious it was my car but I was denied. I appealed to POPLA but they found in Smart Parkings favour. I have received over 9 letters referring to this (each one more sinister) and each time they have addressed it to Mr and I am a Miss. I hoping I get the opportunity to point this out to them as we are all capable of making simple errors! I read all of your responses from the Matalan PCN but it was an old thread and I'm just wondering if I should send them the same response Ericsbrother suggested or has there been a change since then? They did keep quoting the Case in Law in the first few letters but not mentioned it since. I would be very grateful of any help please, I'm tired of their threatening letters. Thank you very much
×
×
  • Create New...