Jump to content

Chipster1!

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Chipster1!

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Thank you so much FTMDave, I wish I could take credit!! I just wanted to make sure I had the context right. You peeps on here are bloody marvelous. Will post it tomorrow and will make sure I get the certificate of posting I hope they leave me alone after this
  2. Ok and thank you very much for all the time, effort and input you have all given me. You are all genius's!! I am going to get on and type the letter back to them, so exciting!! I'll let you all know what happens next, if anything........
  3. Ooooh sounds fantastic to me but as we know, I know nowt!! Thank you so much for your efforts and I'll hang fire until you tell me to go for it.
  4. I had to cut & paste, I'm not very technical, enjoy! He wrote:- would respond to this. Start wth dear sirs, I am in receipt of your letter dated the 31st October 2017 and have noted its contents. You state that I should consider this to be a letter before action or letter before claim. Unfortunately for you I cannot accept this shoddily thrown together piece of tripe to be a LBA as it fails miserably to come anywhere near a lba as required under the revised Civil Procedure Regulations and so would expect a court to summarily dismiss any claim later made by you or your client on that basis. However as you are the parking world third worst firm of solicitors I am not surprised you failed to put any effort into this taradiddle so to make sure that there is no misunderstanding I deny that any monies are owed to your client by myself as there is precedent case law that your clients greed has blindeed them to. The same applies to the inflated amount of the claim, the POFA and contract law are very clear on this point and again plenty of examples of dismissed claims are in the public domain. Your fondness for misquoting the decision of PE v Beavis makes it look like you have never read the full judgement but like the other rent a threats see it as a panacea for justifying any old coddswallop you care to trot out It would be wise if you took your obligations you signed up to when being entered onto the SRA roll and advised your clients it is not in their interests to continue with this matter as they have no cause for action and I shall seek a full costs recover order for any civil claim made under the unreasonableness criteria. Do not be polite to these bandits. Dont forget, you can use the letter you send as evidence should they then continue Edited November 20, 2017 by honeybee13 Paras
  5. Haha, it was Smart Parking Matalan PCN POPLA appeal rejection. It was 8th May 2017. It was a belter!
  6. Oh god, I'm sorry guys, I'm totally new to all this, I thought I'd obscured enough The date of Letter Before Claim was 18th June but I only received it Friday 10th July.
  7. Thanks D. This has got me all of a dither I feel very naive, I thought common sense would rule the day! docs1.pdf
  8. 1 Date of the infringement 24th May 2019 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Never received one. [scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] 3 Date received Never received one. 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N/A 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Yes Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Yes 7 Who is the parking company? Smart Parking 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Medtia Square Oldham Manchester For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here 2 Letters from Debt Recovery Plus LTD. 2 letters Debt Recovery Plus (they have different letterheads & designs). 2 letters from Zenith Collections and 2 letters from CST Law. I tried to attach all of the letters as one multi page PDF as you requested but it wont let me. Says there is a limit of 4.88. Shall I send them individually? And thank you very much for your time and help
  9. Dear Consumer Group Can anyone help me please? I have received a Letter Before Claim for an outstanding amount of £185.00 I paid for my time in the car park but entered two of my registration digits in the wrong order. I appealed immediately to Smart Parking as it was blatantly obvious it was my car but I was denied. I appealed to POPLA but they found in Smart Parkings favour. I have received over 9 letters referring to this (each one more sinister) and each time they have addressed it to Mr and I am a Miss. I hoping I get the opportunity to point this out to them as we are all capable of making simple errors! I read all of your responses from the Matalan PCN but it was an old thread and I'm just wondering if I should send them the same response Ericsbrother suggested or has there been a change since then? They did keep quoting the Case in Law in the first few letters but not mentioned it since. I would be very grateful of any help please, I'm tired of their threatening letters. Thank you very much
×
×
  • Create New...