Jump to content

solarific

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by solarific

  1. Name of the Claimant :  SIP Parking Limited

     

    Claimants Solicitors: None stated

     

    Date of issue – 1 June 2020

     

    Date for AOS - 20 June 2020

     

    Date to submit Defence - 4 July 2020

     

    What is the claim for – 

     

    1.The driver and/or registerred keeper of vehicle XXX XXX incurred the parking charge ('charge¿) on the Relevant Land at Spaw Street Arches, Salford for 'no ticket displayed¿.  

     

    2.The charge was incurred as the terms of the contract (the 'Sign¿) were breached and it is stated on the contract that should there be a breach, a parking charge will be incurred to the sum of £100.00, subject to discount for prompt payment.  

     

    3.The parking charge was issued at XXX on 19 April 2018, with a parking charge notice affixed to the windscreen of the vehicle, under the notice reference of XXXXXX.  

     

    4.The Notice to Kepper dated 23 May 2018 was served upon the Defendant at their last registerred address, which was followed by three further notices dated 25 June 2018, 12 July 2018 and 10 August 2018 along with a Letter Before Claim.  

     

    5.The amount claimed is broken down to £100.00 as per the contract and £60 in damages for the terms of the contract being breached.

  2. Hello

     

    Driver parked in car park 19 April 2018.

    Regular paying user of this car park using both ticket machines and the app.

     

    On the day, driver didn’t have change so left site intending to pay through app within 10 minutes.

    Driver tried several times to pay through the app unsuccessfully.

     

    Attempted to call company, no response after waiting 40 minutes in queue.

    Driver then had to go about their business in Manchester.

     

    Driver has 42 email receipts of paying using the app at this car park dated October 2017 through August 2018.

    They usually paid as walking away from site and within the 10 minutes allowed.

    The keeper is the parent of the driver, who at this time was a student attending lessons in their parents vehicle.

    Keeper is pensioner who has chronic clinical depression, is on strong medication and will not be capable of attending a hearing.

    Driver is carer for parents, is unemployed and on universal credit

    Ticket was on windscreen when driver returned.

    Keeper wrote to SIP the same day explaining the situation and offering to pay for a full 12 hours parking.

    SIP apparently ignored this letter so after 2 weeks keeper sent appeal to SIP detailing above and asked for an appeal code if rejected.

    SIP did not reply to this letter.  


    Notice to keeper received 29 May 2018. K

    eeper replied to this referring to their 2 previous letters stating they would not communicate further with SIP except for through the appeals process.

    SIP again did not reply.

    Although the keeper states they sent all correspondence through registered post, they do not have barcode receipts as they assumed since there was no contact in over 18 months the matter had been dropped.

    Claimant says further letters were sent 25 June, 12 July and 10 August, keeper has no recollection of receiving these letters.

    Keeper received court claim form issued 1 June 2020

    Keeper has chronic clinical depression, is on strong medication and will not be capable of attending a hearing.

    Looking for help on how to proceed with this.

    Should the keeper admit part of the claim, as they did park on the land and made reasonable steps to pay.

     

    The fee for 12 hours parking on this site at this time was £7.95 and the court fee is £25 plus £160 fine and no legal fee.

    Claimant is Haseeb Anwar, who appears to be the sole owner and MD of SIP Parking Limited.

    THis is also the signature on the court form.



    thanks in advance, 

×
×
  • Create New...