Cabman666
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
87 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Cabman666
-
Please disregard post No 26 above. It should read Hi all, Day 32 since NOC issued, and I am about to submit my bullet point defence. I propose the following having taken previous comments into account. 1.I believe the Claimant has no Locus Standi at this location, and the Claimant is put to strict proof of Locus Standi 2. I believe that the signage at the location is prohibitive, and therefore the genuine offer of a parking contract can not exist. A CPR 31.14 request was sent to the Claimant on the 6th June 2020 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of proof of assignment from the landlord to create contracts and make claims in their own name. They declined to provide such proof unless by court order. 3. I believe this claim to be vexatious, as it constitutes an unlawful penalty . Could somebody please confirm that this will suffice as my basic defence. ( needs to be submitted by tomorrow ). Thanks in advance
-
Hi all. Day 32 and I am about to submit my bullet point defence. I propose the following having taken previous comments into account.Claimant has no locus standii at this location and the claimant is put to strict proof of locus standi Signage at the location is prohibitive, therefore a genuine offer of a parking contract does not exist. A CPR 31.14 request was sent to the Claimant on the 6th June 2020 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of proof of assignment from the landlord to create contracts and make claims in their own name. They declined to provide such proof unless by court order. This claim is vexatious as it constitutes an unlawful penalty
-
Hi As predicted by EB, I have received a short reply from dcb legal regarding my CPR request. Their letter is as follows " At this stage within the proceedings,there is no requirement for our Client to furnish you with documents. Should the Court order us to provide documents in the future then we will comply with this. In view of the above the matter will proceed as normal. " I propose the following bullet point defence to be submitted on 3rd July ? Claimant has no locus standii at this location and the claimant is put to strict proof of locus standi Signage at the location is prohibitive, therefore a genuine offer of a parking contract does not exist. A CPR 31.14 request was sent to the Claimant on the 6th June 2020 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of proof of assignment from the landlord to create contracts and make claims in their own name. They declined to provide such proof unless by court order. This claim is vexatious as it constitutes an unlawful penalty I did not use keeper liability / pofa as I had previously admitted to being the driver( even though they seem not to have picked up on this). Is the above ok ? Thanks
-
Hi CPR31.14 request typed up and ready to go to solicitor (recorded deivery) tomorrow. 1. Should I now wait until 3rd July to post my defence on the MCOL website ? 2. Is there anything else I should be doing ? Writing to Landowner ? 3. Should I outline my defence on here for consideration prior to posting it on the MCOL site ? Thx
-
Hi all Here are the answers as requested. I have acknowledged the claim, but not yet submitted any defence. Thanks in advance. Name of the Claimant :Vehicle Control Services Ltd, 2 Europa Court,Sheffield Business Park,, Sheffield,S9 1XE Claimants Solicitors: DCB Legal Ltd,Direct House, Runcorn. WA7 1UG Date of issue –02 June 2020 Date for AOS - Completed online on 19/06/2020 Date to submit Defence - 03/07/2020 What is the claim for – 1. The Defendant (D) is indebted to the Claimant (C) for a parking charge(s) issued to vehicle ****** at Southend Airport. 2. The PCN details are ******** 3. The PCN(s) was issued on private landowned or managed by C. The vehicle was parked in breach of the Terms on C's signs (the Contract), thus incurring the PCN(s). 4. The driver agreed to pay within 28 daysbut did not. D is liable as the driver or keeper. Despite requests, the PCN(s) is outstanding. The Contract entitles C to damages. AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS. What is the value of the claim? - 1.£160 being the total of the PCN(s) and damages. 2. Interest at a rate of 8% per annum pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 from the date hereof at a daily rate of £0.04 until judgement or sooner payment. 3. Costs and Court Fees
-
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
-
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
I did consider those facts, but can’t establish whether the land is actually owned by the railway. -
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
ericsbrother, thanks for that. will do just that -
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
Thanks dx Meant to do it, but working all day !! Yes - no id of driver ! -
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
Hi I appealed online on 28/12/19. I have attached my submission as a further PDF Thanks Appeal Reply.pdf -
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
In that case I shall await a LBA before any next steps -
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
Thanks very much for clearing that up ! excellent news -
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
Ok will do -
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
Confused My ticket has not been issued within 14 days – does that make it invalid? http://www.knowyourparkingrights.org/News/faq#7 The timeframe of 14 days only applies if the operator is relying on the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. If the operator has not mentioned the use of the legislation within their notice, then they do not have to stick to the timelines stipulated within the Act. This usually applies to tickets issued using ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition). -
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
Thanks -
APCOA 2xPCNs - Dartford Railway Station
Cabman666 replied to Cabman666's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
If they don’t subscribe to POFA, were they entitled to get keeper details from DVLA ?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
- Create New...