Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About Bris2wales

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Can we change the thread name to Link Parking vs Michal and i will upload the full transcript. I want this to be “landmark” case because ALL link parking signs are the same. They all same PERMIT instead “of “valid pay and display ticket”
  2. Okay, the judge first ruled that my name was spelt incorrectly and my middle name and surname was the wrong way round even through I made them aware, they still issued claim against the wrong name. I confirmed to the judge I was happy to proceed. The judge ruled in my favour that the sign they relied on said “drivers must display a valid permit” and nowhere on their didn’t did it say you purchase a pay and display ticket. the judge agreed that this sign clearly is for private parking, in a residential area or a similar situation where the driver w
  3. First of all. Sorry for my reply. It wasn’t meant to sound as non cordial as it was. i won my case. And was awarded loss of earnings. It was rule the signage there is a lack of, and the signs that are there are unclear. I’m not too sure if I’m allowed to say anything else? Isn’t there like a secrecy act of some sort ? If some one can advise then I will post the transcript.
  4. Whoa!! Actually I’m on here hopefully to help the OP as I’m in court tomorow for the same thing at the same car park. secondly. The claimant must file a trial pack to the defendant and to the court. thirdly don’t always assume you know everything. fourth. Don’t be an donkey”
  5. So the plot thickens!! Please can you elaborate? Can I use any of this information in court? So so the bank have a charge on the land?
  6. Well it’s all to do with “contract law” as we know. In there witness statement they have said that nobody is permitted to park if the machine is out of order. Nowhere, does it say that on any signs. Whatsoever. according to citizens advice. It says “your ticket should be cancelled if the ticket machine was broken” Further in their witness statement it says that the it is the drivers reaponsibilty to “look” for signs, contrary to the IPC and the BPA code of conduct where it states appropriate signs must be placed at the point of entry “before the driver can make an info
  7. I will do. Don’t think I’m jumping on here with my own problems looking for help. I’m not. Just giving you my info regarding the same. I will upload their witness statement and evidence for you on Wilburn they will rely upon in in court. That way, if you do get a claim form. You will already know what their witness statement says and you can base your defence around that. they will try to bully you into having a paper hearing. Presumably so they don’t have to pay a hearing fee. But take it all the way if you can
  8. Do you want a copy of their witness statement. So you know what they are agoing to say in court. It’s a load of rubbish My witness statement should stand up. I’ve also asked unliquidated damages as counterclaim for breaching of data protection as their was no contravention, they weren’t allowed to obtain my details from dvla, which they did fraudulently. Mma’s far as you and I are aware on entry to the car park we are forming a contract with HD Ltd T/a Simply park.
  9. What is the outcome of this case? I’m due in court end of month for theEXACT same reason at the exact same car park. i have debunked and demythed their witness statement. can u let me know how u got on? I the witness statement the owner of link parking claims there is nothing wrong the ticket machine has never stopped working as this hasn’t been reported to them. Yet it wasn’t working in November 2018.... April 2018 it wasn’t working (according to google street view) and obviously a year later it still isn’t working. cut a long story short I got my ticket in
  • Create New...