Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder

CofiwchDryweryn

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About CofiwchDryweryn

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Site is on right of pictures 1 and 2 here, further pictures show parking are and signs. https://m.imgur.com/gallery/6ctHFLj
  2. Sending nothing in at all seems counter intuitive though. Do I just keep the POFA breach for court?
  3. Someone has been very friendly on facebook and provided the following ... MY Name My address Xxxxxxxxxxx Today’s date xxxxx PCN number: xxxxxxx Dear Sir / Madam, I am in receipt of a Notice To Keeper in relation to vehicle registration number XXXXX This debt is denied. I am the keeper of the above vehicle but am under no obligation to identify the driver as you have failed to comply with a number of criteria outlined in Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 as outlined below. : 1. No period of parking shown or provided. 2. No evidence to support your claim that a breach of terms and conditions occured. 3. " KIRKBY" is not "relevant land" and could in fact be anywhere ( as paragraph 9, 2 (a) Notice To Keeper states that this alleged debt remains unpaid. Please explain how it remains unpaid when this is the first and only corrospendence recived? This wording suggests a NTD was affixed to the vehicle, if this was the case then the Notice To Keeper has been sent before 28 days so you have failed to comply with PoFa by obtaining keeper details before 28 days. I will be sending DVLA a SAR to clarify this to find out when keeper details were requested. If this PCN is not cancelled then please be aware I will not enter into any further correspondence with yourselves or your appointed debt collection agency. Should you still pursue this matter then provide an unredacted copy of the contract between yourselves and the landowner showing proof of your jurisdiction to issue parking charges in this area. Please cancel this and do not contact me again other than to confirm this has been cancelled. Any further correspondence from you will be considered harassment and will be reported to the appropriate authority. Yours faithfully, Registered keeper [Xxxxxx name]
  4. This Seems better, even if ignored because it tries to address the issue ... Re PCN number: I dispute your 'parking charge', as the keeper of the vehicle. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a formal complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner and to my MP. There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn. Since your PCN is a vague template, I require ALL photos taken and an explanation of the allegation and your evidence, i.e.: - As the allegation is regarding being parked outside of a marked bay i require proof, including all photographs taken. The picture in the letter does not show anything apart from the front of my vehicle and the shadow of the person taking the photo. - photographs showing how long the vehicle was parked in alleged contravention as there is a grace period to read the signs and move if required. - you must also include a close up actual photograph of the sign you contend was at the location on the material date. - the driver denies the alleged contravention Formal note: Should you later pursue this charge by way of litigation, note that service of any legal documents by email is expressly disallowed and you are not entitled to assume that the data in this dispute/appeal remains the current address for service in the future. Yours faithfully,
  5. The MSE template does not identify the driver. The driver will never be identified.
  6. MSE suggests the following response regardless of alleged contravention .. Re PCN number: I dispute your 'parking charge', as the keeper of the vehicle. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a formal complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner and to my MP.There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn. Since your PCN is a vague template, I require ALL photos taken and an explanation of the allegation and your evidence, i.e.:- If the allegation concerns a PDT machine, the data supplied in response to this appeal must include the record of payments made - showing partial VRNs - and an explanation of the reason for the PCN, because your Notice does not explain it. - If the allegation involves an alleged overstay of minutes, your evidence must include the actual grace period agreed by the landowner. If you fail to evidence the actual grace period that applies at this site or suggest that only one period applies, this will be disregarded as an attempt to mislead. In the absence of evidence, it will be reasonably taken to be a minimum of twenty minutes (ten on arrival and ten after parking time) in accordance with the official BPA article by Kelvin Reynolds about 'observation periods' on arrival being additional and separate to a 'grace period' at the end.- in all cases, you must include a close up actual photograph of the sign you contend was at the location on the material date.Formal note:Should you later pursue this charge by way of litigation, note that service of any legal documents by email is expressly disallowed and you are not entitled to assume that the data in this dispute/appeal remains the current address for service in the future.Yours faithfully,
  7. It says Independent Parking Committee at the bottom of the sign i posted above. https://imgur.com/gallery/h27hrQA
  8. There are no signs at the entrance but a few dotted around. https://m.imgur.com/gallery/OpiLiRJ
  9. The keeper has received a letter to keeper about not parking in a marked bay by UKCPS. How does the keeper fight this. Managed to covert the letter and here it is ... For completion this was manual NPR not ANPR so ... please answer the following questions. 1 Date of the infringement 12/08/2019 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 14/08/2019 3 Date received 15/08/2019 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Dont think so 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Inconclusive 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up No action taken yet 7 Who is the parking company? UKCPS 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] KIRKBY main car park - free 3 hours max For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS UKCPS Parked in Unmarked Bay.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...