Hi ericsbrother - how do you know that they don't have planning permission or consent for signs? dx100uk - do you have any further advice?

Hi dx - apologies I really am a novice! Hopefully the attached is better. Please let me know if you need anything else. NTK3.pdf

Hi dx100uk. I've now received the NTK - see attached. Are you able to advise next steps please?

ericsbrother - thanks for response. Please see photos as requested + more pix.pdf

Thanks dx100uk - response to relevant questions provided below. I will provide photos of signage at entrance and further photos of marked bays at same location in separate response. For a windscreen ticket (Notice To Driver) please answer the following questions.... I received a Parking Charge Notice (SIP) 1 The date of infringement? 11/05/2019 @ 16:01 2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? No if you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide N/A has there been a response? N/A please post it up as well, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide] If you haven't appealed yet - ,......... have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] Not yet as only 12 days since alleged infringement what date is on it Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? N/A yet 3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N? ]N/A yet 4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? N/A yet [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] 5 Who is the parking company? Simple Intelligent Parking (SIP) 6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? Harding Street, Manchester

Hi Yesterday a group of us visited Manchester and parked at private parking, which later learned was Harding Street, owned by SIP. we paid for 12hrs plus parking as wanted to make sure I covered the cost of stay - but on return found a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) - Reason = "Not in Marked Bay'. We were far from happy as to be honest didn't even notice a marked bay as the lighting was far from good compared to other well known carparks. This is old railway arches converted into indoor parking, so if you can imagine going in from bright conditions to dingy conditions and guess it took some time for eyesight to adjust. I hope someone can help with an independent view of whether the attached represents clear adequate bay marking - I'm not so sure and thought that the owners should take responsibility to keep bays adequately clearly marked. Views most welcome.