Jump to content

eldona-2541

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

eldona-2541 last won the day on November 23 2019

eldona-2541 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About eldona-2541

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

401 profile views
  1. It is not necessary to show that you are native English speaking, but I am not. At least I can speak one language more than you. Can you argue in another language? I am sure that not. Weakness in language skills doesn't make weak other skills. I consider your notice has discriminatory nature.
  2. You named her actions fraud. But where is mens rea? In law, fraud is intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain, or to deprive a victim of a legal right. Fraud can violate civil law, a criminal law, or it may cause no loss of money, property or legal right but still be an element of another civil or criminal wrong. Material or immaterial.... There are circumstances and they are mitigate her action. It is not excuse but mitigation. You cannot take one word from sentence, you have to see a full picture. When you discribe a situ
  3. You wrote :"the owner of the pass told her she could use it ..here take it." It is again incorrect. Could you please read my letter which I wrote for her? She was advised by some friend who is Bulgarian as well,, not by her mother
  4. 1. NO. SHE DID NOT KNOW. IF SHE WOULD KNOW SHE NEVER WOULD DO ANYTHING LIKE SO. 2. She did not even imagine that her acquaintancies could tell her something wrong. She did not think that she need to go and check because she trust them. 3. She has never been in similar situation to run and study law of the UK, she just work and work to survive. Is it so difficult to understand?
  5. What do you think? Dear Sirs, I did not hear from you since my letter of . I apologise profusely for my actions in this case. I pride myself on my integrity and honesty and I feel shameful for my moment of very poor judgement. I have never ever before made anything dishonest, and even in this case it happened so, that we don't speak English and cannot understand English. my mother received this Pass in January 201x, when she came in the UK to work and live here. We lived together with her and when she became ill (she has health problems with
  6. thank you we will try In the list of travels, which they sent to her, is mentioned all travels to different destination. but she went on xx/01/19 to Park. Can we tell that there were not her travels?
  7. It is written by the witness/TFL worker: "I observed a female I NOW KNOW as Miss [--]..." she never had any previous fare evasions or cautions and always was honest before She went to Park for a job inreview (as a cleaner)
  8. She is EU, lives in the UK 4,5 years and she would like to stay here forever. Her son is outside of the UK. Daughter and granddaughter in the UK. She is a professional nurse and she would like to work as a nurse in future. This conviction will close all opportunities They provided her with list of her travels in December and January.
  9. I cannot scan. I have photos from her I cant understand why but i cannot attach anything here her response was: I owe you all an apology. I made very big mistake. Please accept my deepest apologies for my mistake in regard to the fact I was on a TFL service with a wrong ticket. I 've just change my home address and had some family issues (which is not an excuse) and I didn't even realise what ticket I am using. It was not my intention to create such an akward and embarassing situation. If there was any good that
  10. She wasn't delivered to police station. It is my misunderstanding. She was stopped by the underground worker who then asked her questions about the pass and where she was travelling. She did not understand questions in English and the worker used her phone translator to translate into my friend's language. The worker did not ask a lot. She asked her document with photo and my friend provided her driving licence. Then the worker wrote quitely and then asked my friend to sign it. She doesn't know what she signed. This took 45 minutes. She delayed and the potential employe
  11. Sorry for misleading. this is not about myself. It is about my friend. She doesn't speak English. I am not very good in it as well, but I can express my thoughts and understand what you are saying. So, the Requisition to attend Magistrates' Court states: [A] is required to appear on 0Made under paragraph 26 of Schedule 11 to the Greater London Authority Act 1999 and confirmed under Section 67 of the Transport Act 1962. Charge authorised by: [solicitor's name] , Solicitor, Transport for London, 9G3 Palestra [further address] Date xx/04/2019
  12. Hi, I have a problem. Due to financial problems (moved to another area and couldn't reach work place, used Mother's Freedom Pass during 2 months. 80+ charges of multiple use. could somebody please send me example of the letter to TfL regarding byelaws 17(1)? I have the same problem. And how can I find their contacts? Can you please provide them? Thank you very much
  13. Hi, could you please send me example of the letter to TfL regarding byelaws 17(1)? I have the same problem. And how can I find their contacts? Can you please provide them? Thank you very much
×
×
  • Create New...