Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder

Baguettes54

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Baguettes54

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I guess a lot of people, like me, do not know the powers that a dca have and the Agency is using that lack of knowledge as part of their scare tactics. Nice.
  2. Hi Sojacob I have followed the guidance from this group and not replied to any of their letters. They continue to escalate their approach and I am now being written to by a company called Debt Recovery Plus, They have just sent me a Notice of intended court action, whatever that means?! It then states that they will pass my file to their client recommending that they take court action against me. All most confusing, but I am ignoring this one on the assumption that it is not a proper Letter Before Action or from a solicitor and that I am in the right. Hope this helps.
  3. www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2015-0116.html does refer to the Beavis case. Thanks for your reply.
  4. I have now received a letter from Debt Recovery Plus who have been asked to collect payment. My crime, they say, is 46) Stopping in a Zone where stopping is prohibited. If I do not pay by 31st July they will recommend to their client "that they take out court action against me". They quote a case in November 2015 where the Supreme Court ruled that the parking charge was lawful. Details are on line at www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2015-0116.html. This is a very unpleasant technique to extract money from people, like me, who have never had to deal with these kind of people before. I guess the advice still stands not to pay or reply.
  5. Just an update. I have now received a Demand for Payment which says that they may commence legal proceedings if I do not pay, increases the payment to £160 and puts my case in the hands of their Debt Management Team. It also references ParkingEye Limited v Beavis UKSC 67 in the Supreme Court. Thanks for you input and support so far.
  6. Thanks. So you have saved me a letter. As I do not intend to pay there is no value in writing at all!
  7. So I intend to send this tomorrow? Dear VCS, In reply to your letter sent on xx/xx/2019. There has been no breach of any contractual agreement therefore I owe you nothing. Regards
  8. 1 Date of the infringement - 25/3/19 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] - 2/4/19 3 Date received - not recorded 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] - No 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? - Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] - No (should I do this - advice on line is conflicting) Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up - NA 7 Who is the parking company? - Vehicle Control Services Limited 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] - Liverpool John Lennon Airport, Liverpool, L24 1YD For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. - Independent Appeals Service (IAS) I need to appeal or pay by tomorrow to only pay £60 not £100. I have no intention of paying so should I appeal? Thank you for your help Liverpool JLA PCN v3.pdf
  9. I have received the attached PCN from Vehicle Control Services at Liverpool John Lennon Airport and need advice on whether to pay or not. I have read many posts and it would appear that the advice would be to not pay. I would like to ensure that this is the most up to date information. Many thanks Liverpool JLA PCN v2.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...