Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder

Rincon

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    96
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Rincon

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I know I wanted to get it up there smartish and I've spent about 4 months on this outrage. Otherwise I would have included my time.
  2. Thanks-I had read the link at the top but not the following article. I kept it simple and delivered it by hand this for a nominal amount. It is 10 days since the court date, so I will see if there is a positive resonse. This morning**
  3. Ok-Went to court last week. The court process was mad, you couldn't move in there and the clerks were pleasant but it was like having a chat with the milkman. No kind of guidance but we got in after 10 minutes, judge gave me the opportunity to speak on her behalf. She was articulate so it worked with both of us speaking. He seemed to pad it out a lot. He made the point that GLADSTONES hadn't turned up because of the cost, he then said that the notices were misleading but noted that the signs they supplied didn't exist anywhere. the most damning thing was they submitted two different witness statements and had attached one to ours.The judge asked a number of times had we sent the one from GLADSTONES with ours?? I thought the court staff may have stapled it together. More importantly it was different to ours. So after a reference that an image of theirs showed other cars parked outside of bays-he dismissed their claim. now it has cost them £25 and whatever GLADSTONES admin fees but because we had had enough of this bullying we left the building so we have lost a couple of hours wages ,parking and postage costs, about £35 I spent about 4 months looking up references etc. Still glad I did it and thanks for the advice. i will suggest to daughter that she should donate. The bigger issue is many others will fall foul of this type of entrapment.
  4. Dx: half the comments they have put are not relevant or apply to anything we have stated. So not about to throw the towel in just yet.
  5. Ok. Point taken. Still didnt think they should comment before the court date. Not worried just curious
  6. Gladstones refer to an operator-shouldnt this person be present in court as their witness? The account of events by operator are completely ficticious. How can we question this?
  7. They haven't identified any signs- just said signs. Plus I didn't think they are supposed to make comments about our WS until the day? They've gone on about DVLA details and haven't referred to signage at the entrance just the one on site and the fact that she had been to Greggs...
×
×
  • Create New...