Jump to content

Joe C

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Joe C

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Thanks for the advice, I will try them again in the morning. What is a DX so I know what I'm talking to them about?
  2. They just keep saying that they can't find out the reason it was originally struck out even though they have contacted the court in Leicester so there is nothing they can do apart from offer to have it set aside by consent as a gesture of goodwill.
  3. Have tried that, they are absolutely useless. Not remotely interested in being helpful. The stress they are causing is unbelievable
  4. Yeah no problem thanks. The answers will be different for both claims though, the first claim we received info pre claim, the second one nothing.
  5. I'll have to complete that tomorrow when I have all the paperwork in front of me.
  6. Below is the 2nd claim lodged a year later at our old address Good Morning Thank you for your recent correspondence. Please see your case details below as requested. Claimant: ASSET COLLECTIONS & INVESTIGATIONS LIMITED Reference: Particulars of claim: THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS THIS AMOUNT IN RESPECT OFAN UNPAID LOAN, REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974. THE LOAN WAS FUNDED BY THE LENDING STREAM. THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO MAKE PAYMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OFTHE CREDIT AGREEMENT. THE CREDIT AGREEMENT WAS ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT, UPON WHICH A NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT WAS SENT TO THE DEFENDANT. THE DEFENDANT HASEITHER FAILED TO RESPOND TO THE CLAIMANT OR HAS FAILED TO MAINTAIN REGULAR PAYMENTS. THECLAIMANT ISSUED A LETTER OF CLAIM, PROVIDING THE DEFENDANT WITH A FURTHER OPPORTUNITY TO ARRANGE REPAYMENT OF THE OUTSTANDING BALANCE,TO NO AVAIL.THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS INTEREST UNDER SECTION 69OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT THE RATE OF 8% A YEAR FROM 20/06/2016 TO 30/05/2018 ON £1,296.61 AND ALSO INTEREST AT THE SAME RATE UP TO THE DATE OF JUDGMENT OR EARLIER PAYMENT AT A DAILY RATE OF £0.29.
  7. From: Nathan Southern [mailto:nsouthern@assetcollections.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2017 15:58 To: 'hearings@leicester.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk' <hearings@leicester.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk> Subject: Ref: Dear Sir / Madam, I am writing in regards to Defendant Mrs. Xxxxxxxxx relating to above claim number. Please find below the details of how the outstanding balance £1,414.98. The original amount funded was £450.00 on 13/08/2013, due to be paid back in 6 instalments totalling an amount of £990.00. Due to the loan not being paid back in time the outstanding balance at the time the account was sold onto Asset Collections & Investigations was £1,308.83. The account fell into arrears on 30thAugust 2013 as the first payment was not paid in full therefore the Defendant has incurred default charges since that date, incurring £322.00 in interest since the account initially defaulted to the date it was then sold to ourselves. As court action started on the account we then claimed County Court interest at 0.29 pence a day, commencing from 21st June 2016 plus the Court Fee of £70.00, which brings the balance of £1,414.98. If you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact myself. Kind Regards, Nathan Southern Asset Collections & Investigations Limited Unit 49 Grovewood Business Centre, Strathclyde Business Park Bellshill ML4 3NQ
  8. I will do thanks, she has been to hell and back. The humiliation of having to pack her bags and leave the office with everyone watching. I wouldn't mind but she was only changing jobs because we have relocated and her previous position she held for 21 years with impeccable service.
  9. Thanks Bankfodder, I will begin the set aside process straight away. We have shown the employer the strike out judgement but that doesn't appear to be enough for them. They seem to want the CCJ removed immediately which I know is impossible.
  10. Sadly yes, she started on Monday 18th Feb and had to leave on Friday 22nd as they told her no permanent offer of employment would be made due to the CCJ. They have given her a little time to try and get it resolved but that time is running out. TM legal and Asset collections are an absolute nightmare to deal with. It got as far as TM saying they would have it set aside by consent and would send the form to her to sign by close of play last Friday but they never did. I'm not sure if that's the correct process anyway?
×
×
  • Create New...