Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Versus

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Let us take each ofo your points in order you are indeed a strange character, that does seem to understand what a forum is about or somehow blames me for the issues you have or others have had.. Always a good thing to start with an insult, thus portraying the other side are in the wrong, or from the start… as for the forum? I didn’t break any rules, it has none. the jurisdiction decisions made are nothing to do with any poor advise, even if it was or wasn't anything to do with me here on CAG. BUT they were…. Advice was tendered that was both wrong in
  2. FACT... i would not share those details with YOU ... By hat i mean SPECIFICALLY YOU. That is a shame because it means i am restricted in what I feel i can post here. But it is 100000% Justified given the fact that the majority of what you have spouted is proven to be garbage and, indeed, that you behave like a prepubescent keyboard warrior in your insults to the other side (that do not help) LOOK at what you just stated ' in a round about way' A JUDGE has just ordered that (rightly or wrongly) they are within Jurisdiction! what part of that are you failing
  3. ( the result expected by the way as sadly i didnt get to intervene was that they LOST.... ) well done
  4. NO you do not as has been evidenced by recent actions. They will call a hearing on the jurisdiction ONLY if people follow your argument. The N244 sits outside of the jurisdiction hearing.... THAT is why it is not enough to just tick a box and not prepare. Your advice on Jurisdiction was specific and, as a result, got the result expected! You ASSUME and you INTERPRET the lax from a sedentary position. Indeed heckling rather than bringing FACT
  5. all i am doing is joining others here and offering support, thats the point. Good job given recent events. but hey ok. no PM
  6. Yet you choose to try and have a little dig re N244.(for the record I knew and know exactly what it is used for, how, when and why it should be used. No point in arguing with you though) Its not for me to forgive... its good enough for me that you have acknowledged you were wrong. It does highlight the significant issue that people should not make statements without the facts to back them up.... otherwise people get dropped in the sh one t. I will mail you for your thoughts on the section i see in your thesis that COULD be very handy. I WONT p
  7. How so? What error? You cannot seriously be suggesting that it was a slip of the keyboard and that you didnt intend to make a statement or post a link that was, generally, of no use? I think what you are trying to say is that you googled some stuff that met with your own assumptions then posted it? And now when challenged realise? ass u me being a word that you use often. EVERYONE here is trying to help each other. I am not being vindictive. But please understand we are dealing with a very specific and challenging area of Law. People
  8. Andy... a question if I may for clarificatin. You state that forum non conveniens overrides The Rome Convention The Rome convention deals with choice of Law (the sections you signpost too deal with the matter of applied law which in these cases may not be able to argue as the contracts state they are UAE law) Forum non conveniens deals with cases where there is a stated EXCLUSIVE Jurisdiction? As I understand jurisdiction has now been ruled (rightly or wrongly) So a simple explanation of your statement would be helpful.
  9. WRONG It is NOT simply to get the hearing.... you fail to see the opportunity
  10. You ENTIRELY miss the point. 10. What information will you be relying on, in support of your application? the attached witness statement the statement of case the evidence set out in the box below Just ticking the box is NOT what is going to help people.
  11. The directions require a defence and evidence I do not know the defence of a specific case here are a few starters however: The terms and conditions are flimsy and open to interpretation. They are not signed or dated by the customer. This goes against standard Contractual UAE process. The Debt has been written off The statements are clear to the above There is no 'expert evidence' before the court today to support jurisdiction argument, let alone the credibility of the contract IF this matter to be heard under UAE Law in this Jurisd
  12. I would bring the kitchen sink... as CWD do (with bullet points)
  13. your advice was: 10. the Court has no jurisdiction to hear the case. The terms state it is dealt with in accordance with UAE law. A UK Court does not have jurisdiction to hear UAE law cases. There is no Foreign Judgement and therefore no action on the judgement. It should have included much more and evidence. I am not arguing with you but learning..... you cannot just sayout of jurisdiction without providing evidence as to why .. inyour submission and then you can go on to question the rest
  14. Section 10 is quite clear what you can include and should
  • Create New...