Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About b93

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. It is indeed a mobile. We have no alternative phone number to ring it either and I very much doubt he would answer to a private number if we withheld ours, so he doesn't have mine or my partners number.
  2. There is the same letter on the previous page. Only difference to the one from today is that he has handwritten his phone number and name, which I wouldn't be able to disclose. That will be our next step, thank you for your help with all of this. He had ID on a lanyard but couldn't visibly see any company. His handing of the original RLP letter gave him the assumption. I said it was probably a DCA.
  3. Little update: After no replies to the letters, somebody from RLP knocked on the door this afternoon. I was on the school run so it was just my partner at home, he was apparently ex-police. He knocked on the door, partner looked to see who it was then opened the door. The guy said "I'm not here to take anything, I'll go out the gate so we can talk away from the house". He gave his opinion that the case was a load of nonsense, he's read over everything and was originally due to come yesterday but he refused it becaise of his thoughts. He only came today to mark it as 'called'. He sai
  4. I don't have the first 2 or 3 letters at hand, but this was the most recent. img01.pdf
  5. It isn't that it's not sinking in lol, it's the mere fact that this isn't a poxy £50 thing like many have, which is easier to ignore. As she won't have a response to this letter, what are the chances of her telling the client to go further after the 2 week mark?
  6. So it's the case of waiting it out longer for the real boys? He has nothing to his name, only things he owns are his phone (contract) a bike which was taken out under finance with somebody else and his PC. He works 30 hours on national minimum wage, doesn't drive and we rent our property. Considering it took at least 5 months to have a reply from them, they're pretty uptight with their expected received replies. We received a letter in the post today; "Dear Mr XXXXXX Outstanding amount: £XX,XXX.XX Our Client: XXXXXX We refer to previous correspondence in t
  7. Eric, I think you may have clicked on the wrong post? This isn't a Sainsbury's case So, what I've understood is that RLP have nothing to legally stand on and basically act as a CAB-esque company for other companies.
  8. Apologies for the delayed replied, I hadn't received notifications. All evidence used 'for' my partner in his criminal case was essentially used as evidence against him at the same time, which is how £15k came to surface - in which he will no longer have access to as it is destroyed. Unless it is noted in case papers. Goods had been sold all over the UK and overseas between a few of them. What happened to the money made from it - no idea. After doing a simple working out it isn't an obvious amount of luxury money to change a lifestyle, especially if split: 15k / 24 = 625p/m at label
  9. It's due to being a new member. Tried to post link to an image uploader but a message appeared "To be able to post links or images your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 4 posts. Please remove links from your message, then you will be able to submit your post." So you're saying this could be another story as there is already a conviction in place, it'll be hell of a lot easier for them to successfully recover costs? The logo is the silver eye in the middle of a swastika looking flag.
  10. So would you recommend that we leave RLP in their bed and await a notice of court hearing? They don't seem too keen with their reply scheduling. Out of the PDF? Name/Client/Ref were blocked out, what else needs to be done?
  11. So we should wait for the employer to proceed with court and leave the money grabbing middleman out of it and ignore them completely? We're not expecting to pay what things sold for that was just stating the 'official' pocketed between him and/or others amount wasn't the same. The documented amount in his evidence is what we would openly be willing to organise, it wouldn't be down for nothing. His statement (which he had no idea he wasn't legally obliged to do in office) was an estimate. They only originally only wanted him for £60, he admitted things which he knew were
  12. Thank you for your replies. dx100uk - Yeah we tried that approach to begin with, but it isn't that easy with a big sum - hence seeking legal advice. sgtbush - We were told the no contest had to be pleaded (which I didn't attend) as evidence was all over the place and no numbers were in front of the judge, they didn't want him to admit to anything too soon. It wasn't until the first crown hearing he had no choice to plead guilty to £15k as a rounded sum, else it would have been sent to trial and ended much worse. They also had misinformation about him as he was working for a
  13. My partner was dismissed from work in Dec 2016 for gross misconduct - theft of employee. They had him say in statements that it totalled to over £22k (unsure if it was RLP or employer) but only £13k was documented on partners papers and £60 on CCTV. Police were called, he was taken into custody. No charge or bail. Some amount was recovered that night. He missed his summoning due to moving cities and they never updated the system, so he handed himself in after he received a phone call in which he was then escorted to magistrates - plead no contest at his solicitors reques
  • Create New...