Jump to content

applesnpears

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About applesnpears

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Yep your right, I have read up previous threads before but should of searched before posting. Sorry!
  2. Andy, I've received a response from Cabot 2 days ago, the letter however is dated 22 March. They sent me two identical letters at the same time? Maybe a clerical error? It states they've received the s77-79 of CCA 1974, and do not have the information on file. They will however request all items from original lender. They acknowledge the 12 day limit before the credit agreement becomes unenforceable?? They anticipate that they will not get it before this time limit is up but hope to get it within 40 days? if they can't they'll contact me. Same thing, just wait? Do you want to see scan of letter?
  3. ok Andy, so what do I do now just wait for them to send what I've requested? Do I need to check on MCOL to see if anything changes?
  4. I've received a response from the court acknowledging my defence. It says the claimants have 28 days to responsd and that the claimant may contact me. I've also received a response from shoosmith stating that they have requested the same information I want to Cabot and that Cabot may take time because they need the information from New day. Should I upload the letters here?
  5. Submitted defence, MCOL states it will be processed on the next working day
  6. Sorry Andy I wanted to take that part out but couldnt edit the post, yesterdays CPR and CCA are my first requests to them. I received no reconstituted agreement that I know of
  7. With New day Aqua? On my credit report it just shows Cabot now and not New day states 9/12/2016 as acc start date
  8. Can't seem to be able to edit my posts, where it says "additionally I have also requested by way of a CPR 31.14... will that need to be deleted or does that refer to the standard documents Cabot provide everyone when they take over our debt from New Day? I can't seem to find anything they sent me
  9. 1. The claimant claims the sum of £436.86 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a regulated agreement between the defendant and New day and assigned to the claimant on 12/09/2017, notice of which has been provided to the defendant. 2. The defendant has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 3. The claimant claims the sum of £436.86. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are extremely vague. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. Paragraph 1 it is noted I have held in the past a financial agreement with Newday Ltd Aqua. I do not recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification by way of a CPR 31.14 and CCA Section 78 request. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1). Paragraph 2 of the claim is denied. I have not been served with a Default Notice pursuant to the consumer credit Act 1974. Paragraph 3, on receipt of the claim form, I the Defendant sent a request by way of a Section 78 request pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a copy of the agreement, by Royal Mail 1st Class Recorded Delivery, the Claimant has yet to comply and as such is in default of said request. Additionally I have also requested by way of a CPR 31.14 copies of the documents referred to in the particulars. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence any breach and service of a Default Notice; and © show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82 A of the consumer credit Act 1974. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  10. Andy the alternative cpr complient you mentioned, Do I still need that?
×
×
  • Create New...