Jump to content

davey boy

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About davey boy

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. 3. Paragraph 1 is noted, The service was for TalkTalk TV, The service was cancelled by myself within 14 days of the start date, due to an unusable service not fit for purpose; not terminated. I have the letter, sent by TalkTalk confirming cancellation of the TV service. This was the last contact I had with TalkTalk. would that be better? cheers
  2. Hi again guys, I have re-tweaked the defence again, hopefully this one is ok to send. 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The claimant's’ particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16.2 The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2.The claim is denied. I
  3. Hi Andy, I have made the amendments, I do not know if the point I made in paragraph 3 letter c is relevant or if I should leave it out but it popped into my head, so I put it Defence 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The claimant's’ particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16.2 The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any pa
  4. Hi Thanks guys, I missed that number with regards to amendments, it was more a case of do I amend? but I mistook their introduction letter as a notice of assignment. Is the defence ok to admit now then? is the way I drafted the additions into your original defence correct. Also do mcol accept attachments so I can use the receipts and letters as evidence? Thanks Dave
  5. I have received these letters today from Lowell's, I had no previous knowledge of the letters until today. Do these affect my defence in any way and if so how should I amend. Defence 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The claimant's’ particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16.2 The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to a
  6. Brilliant, thanks Andy, I will get that sorted and repost for approval before uploading to mcol.
  7. Hi Guys, I received another letter from Lowell's yesterday, not the information requested CPR 31.14 but just a "phone to make payment" letter notifying me about County Court Claim. I have found Andy's defence that has obviously been successful on a number of occasions, below it I have written the details particular to me and would like to know whether they are worth incorporating into the defence or could they jeopardise the defence as they confirm an original agreement? Andy's defence, 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature
  8. Thanks again guys, i'm having a read through some of the defences now on the case dismissed forum (after popping my thread in search ). Sorry for needing spoon-feeding through the process; all new to me. I have the defence date set in my phone diary
  9. That's the bit i could do with some help with too please. I'm not really sure what to put in it or how to start. I've not had any dealings with law or courts before.
  10. Thanks again. I have sent off the CPR 31.14 today and retained proof of postage, is it now a bit of a waiting game or is there a next step to move onto?
  11. brilliant, I've filled in mcol as advised and will get 31:14 sent off recorded in the morning. thanks for your help
  12. Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio 1 LTD Date of issue – 12 sep 2017 What is the claim for – 1) the defendant entered into an agreement with TalkTalk telecom limited under account ref* (the agreement). 2) the defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated. 3) the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 07/12/2016 and notice given to the defendant. 4) despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £421.27 remains due and outstanding. And the claimant claims
×
×
  • Create New...