Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About deks36

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. And that is exactly as I see it. Fortunately Ive never had one and unlikely to now Ive retired from the trade so unlikely to get one.
  2. In some ways yes I suppose it is and on reading the bye law which applies to my situation of being a private hire driver the argument would be in favour of Heathrow airport that is "3.29 Loading of private hire vehicles No person shall cause or permit a Private Hire Vehicle to load passengers at the Airport other than in an official car park." however does this make it legal for the police to issue a ticket anyone picking up outside of an official car park?
  3. Heathrow airport drop off though this could apply to any airport I expect.. Heathrow airport is private land and I have a response from the Met police stating that and that they are paid to police the land by Heathrow airport.. Now I accept a need to police it for security reasons and because in motoring terms a lot of traffic uses the area daily. However on occasions the Met police decide they will clamp down on people picking up from the drop off areas which by the signs posted is an offence some signs state its an urban clearway no stopping allowed except for dropping off s
  4. Just want to update to advise that parking eye do not wish to contest my appeal no reason given back popla Would like to thank the people on this forum for their help and advice To any one searching for the first time my advice is don’t ignore a letter but read the forum on how best to respond
  5. thank you.. it looks as if I have messed up my appeal due to my impatience so it looks like I'll end up in court over it. Where I expect I will need to be much better prepared
  6. thank you. Yes i recognise there are plenty of people who just pay up.. I had a previous issue courtesy of my daughter on that occasion I chose to brave it out and ignore the letter(s) though I did get advised this wasn't a good course of action so took that on board this time and responded to it. They were different companies and I was lucky with the other one who didn't pursue it though it does look as PE will take them as far as they can and hope to win the day
  7. thanks for the reply, sadly too late for me as I already submitted the appeal. I dont fully understand how to argue points in a legal manner. However my time is precious as I am currently in the middle of selling my business and and in the middle of starting a new one elsewhere along with moving.. If push comes to shove I'll name the idiot driver who chose to stop in a car park he had no reason to be in and even worse take on face value the person their telling him its ok as the machine was broken.. What I dont understand is how its OK for them to lie about evidence bu
  8. ok so Ive copied and pasted a few bits from the links posted. I expect I ve got it all wrong but this is what Ive written(not yet sent) The land is not 'relevant land' for the purposes of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 ("POFA") T, by virtue of paragraph 3(1)© of Schedule 4 of POFA, the Operator has no right to recover under POFA. There are previous cases where Popla have decided on this and agreed there is no right to recover from the registered keeper.Therefore there is no keeper liability. the signs as unclear/ not enough of them/acres of small text/ mounted so high
  9. HOW DO i FIND names of cases? the link just says mr X.. what is a precis please?
  10. in my appeal I stated there would be no admission to who was driving on the date in question. I said the NTK was to late to meet pofa requirements
  11. UPdate from parking eye as probably expected my appeal to them was unsuccessful so I know have my code for popla I wonder if I might ask how I should word the appeal I am the vehicles registered keeper I was not the driver and nor have I named the driver. the event was on the 28th May it was a payment required car park but driver didn't make payment as machine was broken (I am unable to say if other machines exist on site) notification received 7/7/18 on the reverse of the notification is a lie that says they contacted the registered keeper from records held by DV
  12. thanks guys.. really appreciate the advice. Now to work on my appeal to PE and then no doubt ultimately POPLA I doubt this is relevant but ill mention it on the 18/6/18 I removed the cherished plate from this vehicle to which this letter applies and replaced it with its original registration so from that I can deduce wrongly or rightly that PE must have got the details prior to this date I dont know if this has any relevance or not but worth a mention if it makes my task easier
  13. yes the letter is address to me a the registered keeper and not as the driver as I wasn't thanks for your input
  • Create New...