Jump to content

Rovarp

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Rovarp

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. This is the defence that I think is most appropriate for my wife's case. Any last minute amendments and should I include point 6? 1. It is denied that the Claimant entered into a contract with the Defendant, or broke any such contract. 2. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the te
  2. So I have not received a response from the solicitors to my CPR31 request and my wife's defence is due this coming Friday. If it is a standard defence that I should be entering, please can I ask which one I should use? Thanks, R
  3. So far, we haven't mentioned that it is possible my wife entered the wrong reg number or given them that number to check. Should I now be doing this then?
  4. Logged into MCOL and AoS was received on 23/11/20. I will send CPR this afternoon. Thanks
  5. Both cars are registered to me, so original PCN was in my name. My wife in her appeal said she was driving and she has received all subsequent correspondence. (We now know this was a huge error). I am sure if we had the list of registrations for the day, we could identify the purchase but that is not forthcoming. I did request the PDT machine record of payments made that day in the SAR. It's just if this is the main thrust of the defence and how to present it if it is.
  6. Name of the Claimant : National Car Parks Limited, Saffron House, 14B St Cross Street, London, EC1 8XA Claimants Solicitors: BW Legal. Enterprise House, 1 Apex View, Leeds, LS11 9BH Date of issue – 10 Nov 2020 Date for AOS - I posted AoS on 19th November 1st class. Date to submit Defence - Please advise (apologies for not contacting you guys earlier) 11-08-2020 - dx What is the claim for – 1.The claim is for the sum of £170.00 being the contractual charge due from the Defendant in respect of a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) for a c
  7. For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident) please answer the following questions. 1 Date of the infringement 06/12/2019 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 19/12/2019 Uploaded as NTK.pdf 3 Date received It could have arrived any day after 19th December as we arrived home on 31/12/2019 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No 5 Is t
  8. Hello all, This is my first thread, so I hope I am following protocol. My wife parked in an NCP car park late last year. It is controlled by ANPR and she bought a ticket and displayed it on the dashboard. We were away for Christmas and on our return discovered a PCN from NCP waiting for us. I can supply the dates but I do not know how much information of the case I should disclose here at this stage. She wrote back to NCP saying she had bought a ticket and saying 'We have no record of any payment being made against your vehicle registration number'. She was driving our da
  9. My wife has received PCN from this same car park. She bought a ticket at the time but had thrown it away by the time she received the PCN as there was a fortnights holiday in the interim. Please can anyone advise the best way to use this forum for advice on this one? We have requested a PDT machine record of payments made that day, but this has not been forthcoming. She now has a claim form from County Court Business Centre and I would be most grateful of any advice in the best way to present her defence. Thank you in advance.
×
×
  • Create New...