

mystirio
-
Content Count
277 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by mystirio
-
-
they will be lucky:madgrin:
-
e mail from FOS investigator he is now in receipt of my files and will investigate further
however from lowlife asking if i was willing to make an early reduced payment this letter is now in the drawer
-
thanks for the support
-
had another request from capp iasking for me to consider paying
will upload asap
thinking of taking legal action when they have already done so in july
still waiting for response
also enclosed income and expenditure sheet
-
hopefully you are right again dx
thanks
-
thanks for that dx
wonder what their next move might be
-
well iI was wondering what was happening with this claim and was in 2 minds to ask county court for update but said leave it as it is
However today had recieved a letter from capquest regarding claim
noted that they said that the copy of assigment was enclosed I cant find it in the envelope
I know from experience what the answer will be (Let Them stew)
enclosed copy of letter from Cappie
-
Reply from fos
provi wont let fos look at the loans as it is over 6 years and they dont keep documents for longer than 6 years
however, told fos that provi have supplied me with accounts which span for 9 years
and that also they shouldn't need to talk to their agent regarding my credit search as they should have done this themselves
fos came back stating that they will look at the paperwork again and contact provi
Might not get me anything but its another official complaint against provi
when they wont want anymore
-
letter from robbers today they have sent the account to their client and have
closed their file as far as they are concerned
thanks once again
-
just had a letter from FOS they are writing to provi requiring them to supply
all the documents they have
-
thanks yet again dx:-)
-
just had a letter from robin may apparently this is for an unauthorised overdraft from27/11/09
il post letter and page containing intrests later
this is the paper
-
looking at other threads on the web fos have considered dates later than 6yearsold
-
have sent the form to FOS asking to look at my complaint if they will is another matter
however without trying you wont know
-
thanks dx
I am going to write to provi again asking to reconsider the complaint
also will add some extra information Il put it up here first
-
just read on another forum the six plus 3 year rule anyone know about this???
-
from FOS
Hi
As the firm will not accept a complaint from you on this matter then the Financial Ombudsman Service will not have jurisdiction to take a complaint from you.
That would leave you with seeking out your own independent legal advice on this matter.
The Citizens Advice Bureau provide some legal guidance and may be able to provide you with some guidance on your next steps legally.
can Andy englighten us on this one???
-
-
therefore dx what your reccomendation send it to FOS or wait to see wgat they come back to me with their response the fos I mean
because it is not miss selling it is iresponsible lending
-
looks like they are trying the ppi miss sold one but this is neither
this is irresponsible lending
I have e mail FOS saying this was irresponsible lending and have stated that they will not consider it and I think FOS are interested in this claim
due to the ongoing issue with provi
we will wait to see what FOS comes up with
thanks DX
Thank you for your email to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
I understand that you are looking to make a complaint to Provident about irresponsible lending and the firm have rejected this on the basis that it is more than six years ago. You want to understand if the six years is from inception or six years after the last payment was made.
FCA Rules
DISP 1.8 Complaints time barring rule
If a respondent receives a complaint which is outside the time limits for referral to the Financial Ombudsman Service it may reject the complaint without considering the merits, but must explain this to the complainant in a final response in accordance with DISP 1.6.2R.
The complaints handling rules set time limits for consumers to refer complaints to the Ombudsman. After these time limits have expired, the Ombudsman will need the firms consent to look into a complaint.
Generally, these time limits are:
- six months from the business sending the consumer a final response; and
- six years from the event the consumer is complaining about (or three years from when the consumer knew, or could reasonably have known, they had cause to complaint).
Accordingly the rules do not specify whether the period begins from inception or from the date of the last payment as you are asking, rather from when you knew or could have reasonably known. If you are complaining about mis-selling then the mis-selling would have occurred at the beginning of the term of the contract and not at the date of the last payment.
I hope this information has been helpful.
- six months from the business sending the consumer a final response; and
-
i have sent an e mail to foc and they are very interested in what provi have said
-
another letter from lowlife yesterday regarding the account any advice regarding this seems like a normal letter
1 thing i did notice provi have not supplied me with copies of the terms of agreement in my
sar
this is the letter
-
good I hope it will help other families which are struggling to pay these sharks
-
its not the priciple of not paying we intend to paydx
its doent seem right for someone to put your signature on a
document
Lowell and Provi doorstep loan CCA
in Provident and associated companies.
Posted · Edited by dx100uk
spacing
update from FOS
they have sent me a letter stating that they have had so many people who are quoting the 3 year period that they are looking at cases to see if
the arguments are justified in following the complaint
its just a matter of waiting
however if they do pass that they must pay then this will open the flood gate for so many people who have been treated wrongly
thanks