Jump to content

greenman001

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About greenman001

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. but ABC is representing the claimant NO " ABC" (the banana) is not representing the claimant "company a" the orange I HAVE HAVE IT IN WRITING FROM " ABC " THE BANANA " THAT THEY HAVE NOT INSTIGATED THESE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ME (THE LEMON) "company b"
  2. HELLO THIS IS MY FIRST POST, need some advice just had N24 ORDER ISSUED TO ME ( I AM DEFENDANT "company b" as follows;- claimant " company A " V defendant "company b" Before district judge sitting at county court BLAH, BLAH IT IS ORDERED THAT MR XYZ, the director of "company b " pay principal debt of £xxx.xx to...... "ABC" by /on SO and SO DATE.. " ABC " is not the claimant "ABC " has not issued claim I HAVE NOT PAID "ABC " HEARING SCHEDULED END OF JUNE IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THIS ORDER IS OUT OF ORDER, ANY ADVICE PLEASE
×
×
  • Create New...