That is everything that was included in the 'Particulars of Claim' section of the N1 form. The location has been included on other forms I have received, like the 'Notice to Keeper', and the letter from the solicitors, but not on the N1 form itself

Particular of Claim Date 1/5/16 Description: None Amount £150 Due Date 15/6/16 Total Due £150 AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS The Claimant claims the sum of £151.61 for Parking charges and indemnity costs if appliciable including £1.61 interest pursuant to S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 Rate 8.00% pa from dates above to 3/8/16 Same rate to Judgement or (sooner) payment Daily rate to Judgement £0.03 Total debt and interest £151.61

I just received this email from Gladstones...... Please note CPR 31.14 does not apply to your case and all relevant documents will be provided in our Client's Witness Statement. We will not litigate by correspondence and any future queries should be directed towards the Citizens Advice Bureau or your own independent legal advisors. Regards Phoebe Litigation Assistant

I have attached the particulars from the N1 letter

Which letter would that be on?

Hello, I have yet to receive the documents that were requested through the CPR31.14 letter you have helped me to write, and the defense is due by tomorrow, based on previous messages sent on this thread. I have signed confirmation that they have received the letter, but heard nothing back. As I need to get the defense sorted ASAP, do you have any suggestions for what I should do?

Thank you for your help, the letter has been emailed to them. I will keep you informed

I've added the planning permission into the letter. Is this what you meant? CPR_31.14_Letter 2.PDF

I've removed the bits mentioned in the earlier post. Can you tell me if any other changes should be made? CPR_31.14_Letter (1).PDF

Hello, I have taken your advice, and written a CPR 31.14 letter using a template I found online. Can someone advise on any changes which could be made to improve the letter before I send it off. Many thanks CPR_31.14_Letter.PDF

I sent them this..... Dear Sir/Madam I have been advised to write to you with the following,regarding your client Minster Baywatch no monies are owed because your client was and is not in a position to offer a contract at that site and their presence there is a breach of the planning permission granted to Reel cinemas and as such one cannot enter into a criminal compact with them. Any legal action by your client is doomed to fail as they well know so a full costs recovery order will be sought should they continue their malicious actions this car park belongs to the Reel cinema not Minster Baywatch, any run overs in the car park that are caused by the cinema should be reviewed by the cinema to see if the car owner was in fact in their cinema at the time and if the film did in fact run over and they responded with this...... Miss Broomhead I write further to your email. As a claim has been issued we will continue with the court process. You may wish to seek legal advice. Regards Ellie I'm now at a lose as what to do

Thanks, thats very interesting, I thought is was weird it had 2 companies on the sign....but and yes it would be nice to know who has the right to fine me.....it should be Reel

these are the pictures from the car park....according to the main sign it has 2 companies who run the car park...is this normal pix.pdf

I have submitted the acknowledgement of claim on the MCOL website. What should be done now?

Based on the address on the form, as well as the return address which was on the envelope, it would appear to be from the county court