Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by callum1999

  1. Same old same, any contribution that remotely incriminates a solicitor or anything with a legal qualification gets whitewashed.
  2. Moving back and on subject i now find myself in a position whereby the evidence that has been ignored by the other side as this would undermined their case/defence is not not an option for them or anyone else to conveniently hair brush out of is no longer an option nor right i would assume. If as suspected they cannot produce what the OCI have indicated that they must produce, this will now demonstrate that the solicitor was and never was in a legitimate position of representing and thereafter making unlawful profit from those actions.
  3. And to remove any doubt the OP was not in a position "TO PROVIDE" their evidence because the solicitor who had acted negligently was, is and still wants to breach DPA. That said, any giving the stance taking by the OCI, he has now lost that right as it would now appear.
  4. I have been giving summary judgement which the solicitor is appealing against on the claim that the solicitor breached DPA. The other side are claiming the issue with any breach of DPA has been previously dealt with under the negligence claim which was not an issue nor was it mentioned in those proceedings. What, if any weight does the reason that the OCI have adjudged my rights under the DPA have been breached will the Court consider?
  5. The Information Commissionaires Office and after investigating have decided that a previous firm of solicitors have breached the Data Protection Act 1998, by failing and when requested to provide data that would demonstrate funding and a legitimate contract were in place when it has been alleged that they were in a position to (a) legally represent, (b) and profit from the misrepresentation. The OCI have now instructed the firm to provide all the needed data within seven days. What are the consequences if any if the firm continues to ignore and provide this information?
  6. Have just been giving judgment in respect of a litigation that i had against a previous solicitor who breached the Data Protection Act, and still continues to breach the Act which is stopping me from relying on the data that would show that he has committed a number of breaches which would include concealing evidence relevant to a case. Further the Information Commissionaire Office have now also advised me that the solicitor has ignored their request for this information and the 28 day period for the solicitor to give his reasons has now expired. But for this information being disclosed this is allowing the solicitor to avoid the proof that would demonstrate that he has breached a number rules and Acts. He seems to be hiding this evidence or no evidence to suggest a contract was in place can be provided, the latter being the more likely.
  7. So you need a lawyer and the funds to be able to pay for one and that will guarantee the Court and the judge to consider the case on equal terms. All things being equal it should not come down to who is making representation it should be based on the evidence of fact which on this occasion and on many occasions is being ignored which is how the legal system unfortunately works and has claimed yet another victim.
  8. No And what other issues are you wanting to obey??
  9. I have contacted the Council head of legal services who dealt with a claim that i had against them and they say that they are satisfied with the legal bill that my solicitor has incurred and subsequently paid. They have referred to a letter that shows justification in the payment but are not prepared to show me the letter or the legal bill that shows how those costs were incurred. Can i request this information or would this be outside the scope as to right to data under DPA. Any help would be appreciated. thanks Callum
  10. Well if the document never existed how on earth could i prove that without obtaining the client file that would contain the document and if there was no such document the allegation would then be factual. I have to prove there was no contract and to be able to do this i would need to have site of the file which as you know the solicitor and his solicitor/barrister are refusing to disclose. What is bizarre and what really points to the fact that there was no legitimate contract in place could and will be drawn from the very fact that the solicitor knows that providing the file will show there was no contract because the file will be minus the documentation as to establish this significant point. On the other hand i suppose the solicitor could own up and say the file does not would not and never has had the documents that would prove that he was working under a legitimate contract but he wont do that now will he.
  11. Ask the DPA, they obviously feel that a breach on the part of the solicitor has been committed, unlike me and you they deal with such matters on a regular basis. I am more than willing to PM your the relevent reference number if you feel obliged to challenge. Do you want it all do you want to carry on pretending because it really makes no odds to me.
  12. PMSL, it is not for C to prove a contract was never in place. That is unless C made a tidy profit from such misrepresentation:lol:
  13. Yes that has been covered and the Information Commissionaires Office are now satisfied that the time period has now expired hence why they indicated that they wanted me to report it which again has been fully completed and indexed with a caseworker. As for not producing something that doesn't exist the fact that those legally representing the solicitor have already stated that they were not prepared to produce something that don't exist!? was not because it did not exist which is now obvious but because civil proceedings were ongoing which was not on;y a poor excuse it is an excuse that i can now rely on.
  14. Appeal is going well tbh once i get i result which is going to be inevitable and in a proper court next time i will post the result up. Anyway this thread has nothing to do with the solicitor merely acting negligent this is the next level which will be discussed by grown up people so adios.
  15. You can think what you want No-one is forcing you to read my posts are they? You do not police the forum and you have no more rights than me or anyone else to keep running to the site crying like a new born baby trying to get every post removed grow up. This is a public forum try and remember that you are just part of it like me and all the other posters we are all equal again remember that.
  16. SRA are dealing with a number of separate issues which would include the contract and i am currently awaiting a response which is pending. The ICO are investigating the solicitor as they feel the solicitor is in breach of DPA for not providing any data that would have been needed authorised and signed by me for funding to be obtained prior to contract/retainer being in place based on my personal ID that would have been used, if correct. I did not say being giving a crime reference number is an indication of guilt however and on the evidence that has been considered by Fraud action you could also argue that for them to consider and provide a reference would not be the indication of the solicitor and on the balance of probabilities is more like than not to be guilty for a reference to be giving in the first instance.
  17. So the ICO and SRA LA are not involved thats news to me giving that i have just spoken to a caseworker. How is that fantasy or more to the point why on earth would anyone state this if it was not true? I can PM the reference numbers if you want GM and the crime reference number provided by Action Fraud if you want to help.
  18. Thanks for that UB This wont take five years:-) I am not complaining i am just trying to rely on the law and as it stands. If the solicitor has acted inappropriately because he is a solicitor will not make him immune. The only person i am blaming is the solicitor, if others want to protect him so be it because it will not change what he has done and whether people believe he has or not again its their opinion they like me have a right to opinion. If the solicitor has not done as was expected of him this will eventually come out it always will. It just depends how the person acts if it affects them some walk away others dont.
  19. I have since giving further details and made them aware that because the solicitor is failing to show proof that he worked and represented me under a legitimate contract this is now being investigated by a number of Organisations who would have to be involved to fully establish the questions or the validity of the contract that the solicitor would have had in place not only to represent but to profit which could only have been achieved but for my claim against the council. The police have previously provided me with a crime reference number and on the grounds that the solicitor made profit be it unlawfully as the crime reference number provided would indicate this i would assume.
  • Create New...