Jump to content

Paul Barnes

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Paul Barnes

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Hi, This notice is located on many sites that talk about common law in different forms, however the one I posted was sent directly from corresponds with a Solicitor in Nov 2015, although the more I look at the wording, I tented to find "implied licence" is more appropriate for trespass point of view (again I'm learning all the time so maybe completely wrong). I also agree that this is a civil matter and would need to be dealt with in civil court (trespass). The reasons for all this is to stop, 7+ per day cold callers (over years) and to protect my Dogs from the barbaric changes to t
  2. Implied Right of Access is a law within Common law, which is the main law that governs our land (England), so can not be in any way rubbish. Law is law.... Note, I am here to further educate myself by asking people that I believe have the correct knowledge of this field, I also agree that many sites misrepresent common law (bailiffs for example and IRoA), causing a great deal of problems for people that are just wanting the correct answers, but listen to the wrong people. I just want clarification from people that are in the know, of the laws, acts I was enquiring about, also after r
  3. Thanks again for reply. Any thoughts on this part? Second, if you have this notice up can this be used as a defence against the "amended in 2014" Dangerous Dogs Act", which states "Except Trespasses", meaning your Dog will not be taken away as the "Implied Right of Access" Notice (excluding people named on the Exceptions) are now trespasses. Paul Barnes
  4. Is this Better: Removal of ‘Implied Right of Access’ Notice: Except: Family, Friends, Postal Services, Delivery Services and the Emergency Services - (limited to the time needed to deal with the reported emergency), Enforcements agents operating under section 14 of schedule 12 of the tribunals courts and enforcement act (Note: A Enforcement agent has NO legal right to force access (nor is it implied by this notice) to a residential property, only by “Peaceful” entry by invite only)). Any other person(s) and/or any companies not on the exceptions list above will be liable to Prosecut
  5. Hi All, First thing, is this notice now legal or does it need more work? READ THIS NOTICE Removal of ‘Implied Right of Access’ Notice: Except: Family, Friends, Postal Services, Delivery Services and the Emergency Services - (limited to the time needed to deal with the reported emergency), a Bailiff with a valid Court Order Signed by a Judge including full printed name of Said Judge. (Note: A Bailiff has NO legal right to force access (nor is it implied by this notice) to a residential property, only by “Peaceful” enter by invite only)). Any other person(s) and/or any companie
×
×
  • Create New...