The case is about whistleblowing and race discrimination .. The whistleblowing was struck out as no reasonable prospective of success .. The Judge found that the Claimant blow the whistle and was victimised but the old regulation does not protect whistleblowers from being victimised by other employers (including Managers/CEO) .. the regulation was changed but the whistleblowing happened before the change .. The race discrimination stuck out as an abuse of the proceedings There is no order against me that I have to pay the cost yet .. There will be another hearing to decide upon the cost .. whether I have to pay or not and if so how much

Thank you very helpful information .. It is Employment Tribunal (ET) .. The statement of their legal cost is about £70,000. There is a hearing for the judge to decide upon the cost and it seems that the judge will allow it .. I don't have a solicitor but I have to do my best to dispute it during the hearing .. Any help/idea/method will be really appreciated They provided the hours spent and the rates under general titles such as "work done on documents" or "reviewing documents" .. It does not look like a breakdown for me .. It does not say if it is in 'standard' or 'indemnity' basis One of the cases were struck out more than 6 month ago .. but they also include the cost of it .. Would not that be out of time? Thank you again

I'm newbie .. sorry if I'm post this in the wrong place .. I'm an individual .. I lost a legal case against two powerful organisations. The statement of their legal costs is unbelievably high .. How can I resist/dispute that in an attempt to make it reasonable?