Jump to content

stihl2015

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by stihl2015

  1. Update Update..... not that it matters.......

     

    Spoke to the court today after waiting in the call Queue for what seemed like forever..

     

     

    .. I was advised that the court had received a copy of Lowell's DQ also but could not act on it as they had not sent it out and the claim has and still is STAYED!!!!!

    no fees have been paid to lift the stay or requests to lift the stay...

     

    The guy at the court did say that this has been happening a lot from Lowell's over last couple of weeks...

     

    He also stated that a letter had been sent to Lowell's stating the claim was and still is stayed, and any further action would need a Judges authority..

     

    Nice try Lowell.....

  2. Update.......

    its been a couple of days since receiving the "we have filed our DQ with the court" letter from Lowell....

    .

    Still no sign of my DQ from the courts themselves yet!!!!

     

    Been working away so unable to call the courts to confirm whether or not Lowells letter is legit or not. Will ring the court first thing Monday.

     

    After reading several other threads regarding Lowell this seems to be their new tactic to try and fleece people...

  3. Update Time.....

    Its seems Lowell Solicitors are trying their luck....

     

     

    Back story..

    Defence filed 30/10/2016.... defend all.

    Confirmed via MCOL 31/10/2016.

    No response from Claimant regarding defence.

    No paper response from Northampton regarding defence.

     

     

    85 days later I get a letter from Lowell stating that they have lodged a directions questionnaire with Northampton and that I should be receiving one soon from Northampton to file as directed...

    Funny thing I find is that how come the claimants solicitor can receive and file a DQ before the defendant has even received one?? surely the court issues these DQ's

    Also on the Claimants copy of the DQ they have stated that there will be no witness's available for claimant for the hearing (if it goes that far haha)

     

     

    whole thing sounds like a crock o poo to me..

     

     

    a couple days wait to see if anything turns up from Northampton then if nothing a quick call to the court to confirm the claim is stayed and no fee paid to lift stay...

  4. Time for a little update.....

     

     

    Defence filed 19/12/2016

     

     

    Defence Acknowledged by Court letter dated 19/12/2016 received 21/12/2016

     

     

    Letter dated 07/12/2016 received from Cabot referencing the CCA request I made on 28/11/2016,

    they acknowledge they do not have the information I require on file and have requested all information from the original creditor.

     

     

    They go onto acknowledge that the 12 day limit before the agreement becomes temporarily unenforceable,

    then go on to say that they anticipate that they cannot provide the information within 12 days but hope to provide it within 40 days..

     

    Letter dated 30/12/2016 received from claimants solicitors Mortimer Clarke stating my defence of 19/12/2016 has been received and they are taking their clients instructions. and the meantime the matter has been put on hold...

     

    so there's a condensed update

  5. Thanks for the responses received so far, its now time to rev up the defence and get it filed before the close of play Tuesday 20th if I've got my calculations right.... here's what I have

     

    POC...

    By an agreement between capital one and the defendant on or around 01/07/2009 (the agreement) Capital one agreed to issue the defendant with a credit card.

    The defendant failed to make the minimum payments due and the agreement was terminated.

    The agreement was assigned to the claimant.. the claimant therefor claims xxxx

    Defence......

    1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies upon CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to which a specific response has not been made.

     

    2. The Defendant accepts that he has held an account with Capital One in the past. And cannot recall the precise details of the agreement or recall any alleged amounts outstanding. I have therefore sought clarity by way of a CCA section 78 request and a statement of account, sent via recorded delivery to the claimant on 29/11/2016 and received by the claimant on 30/11/2016. The claimant remains in default of this request...

     

    3. It is denied that I failed to make payments as I am not aware of what agreement the claimant purports to rely on. I requested copies of the documentation relied upon by way of a CPR 31.14 request dated 29/11/2016, the claimant has failed to supply any supporting documentation or a satisfactory response.

     

    4. I am unaware of any assignment and it is denied that I have ever received any Notice of Assignment pursuant to The Law of Property Act 1925

     

    5. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

     

    a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement on which the claim relies upon; and

     

    b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

     

    c) show how the Claimant has the legal right either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

     

    6. As per the CPR Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

     

    7. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law and Property Act.

     

    8. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief

     

    Stihl2015

     

  6. Thanks again for your response.... Defence is due by the close of play Tuesday 20th but I plan on submitting it the Sunday night before...

    Still no response to CCA from Cabot, recent letter from Mortimer Clarke ignored....

    I'm guessing a no paperwork defence will be the order of the day..... Please what is the easiest way of finding such a template to tweek to meet my claim from Cabot..

     

     

    Stihl2015

  7. Hi All,

    I'm sorry to return but I again need a little bit of advice regarding a letter from Mortimer Clarke in relation to an alleged debt with capital one...

     

    I received a claim form from Cabot Financial via Mortimer Clarke....

     

     

    Details below

     

    Claim Form Issue....18/11/2016

    Received.... 21/11/2016

    AOS Submitted... 29/11/2016 Defend all

    AOS Received... 30/11/2016

     

    CCA request sent to Cabot...28/11/2016

    CCA request received by Cabot and signed for.....30/11/2016

    CPR request sent to Mortimer Clarke... 28/11/2016

    CPR request received by Mortimer Clarke and signed for... 30/11/2016

     

    POC...

     

     

    1.By an agreement between capital one and the defendant on or around 01/07/2009 (the agreement) Capital one agreed to issue the defendant with a credit card.

    The defendant failed to make the minimum payments due and the agreement was terminated.

    The agreement was assigned to the claimant..

    2.. THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS XXXX...

     

    As of todays date the following has happened....

    1) No response from Cabot for the CCA request

    2) Mortimer Clarke responded to the CPR request with the following letter dated 01/12/2016 received 07/12/2016

     

    Dear XXXX

    We acknowledge your request for documentation pursuant to CPR 31.14

     

    We Confirm our client is willing to agree to the extension of 28 days, for you to file your defence, Pursuant to CPR 15.5(2) please notify the court in writing of the agreement....

     

    CPR 31.14 relates to a right to inspect a document and can be distinguished from standard disclosure of evidence during the course of proceedings.

     

    We believe that you may have already "inspected" the documents to which you make reference because on various dates in the past they would have been sent to you by another party such as the original creditor.

     

    We would be grateful if you could confirm what documents you have in your possession or control relating to this matter to avoid duplication over document inspection. We will then take our clients instructions...

     

    So my question is....

    Do I ignore the letter from Mortimer Clarke?

    reply to Mortimer Clarke with something along the lines of....

    not interested in your beliefs, supply the documents requested in the CPR 31.14 request...

     

    As always your help/advice is greatly appreciated

  8. Hi All,

     

    I'm looking to get some advice on my next move as I can't seem to find the answer easily online and fed up of spending time on the phone to NCCBC and being on hold....

     

    on the 03/10/2016 I received a Claim form dated 29/09/2016 from Lowell Solicitors claiming I owe Lowell Portfolio for an old Vanquis debt.

     

    AOS with defend in full duly filed 18/10/2016

     

    12/10/2016 CCA letter sent to Lowell portfolio..... as of yet not response.

     

    12/10/2016 CPA and CCA sent to Lowell Solicitors,

    Lowell confirmed receipt of request on 21/10/2016

     

     

    Nothing heard from Lowell Portfolio or Lowell solicitors by 30/10/2016

     

     

    a defence of no paperwork/CCA etc was filed on 30/10/2016 and received 31/10/2016 on the MCOL website.

     

    Now my question is

    what to do next as

     

     

    I have not received anything from NCCBC or Claimant in regards to allocation questionnaires etc etc

    and over 28 days have passed since filing my defence.

     

    Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated

     

    Thanks

×
×
  • Create New...