elcordobez
-
Posts
64 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by elcordobez
-
If you dont open your door to rossendales or have a car outside, they eventually return it to the council. theres your chance to make an offer to pay what you can afford
-
this thread started out as an information post. no debate, just a statement. an utterly wrong one and looking at the pages and pages of tt sticky threads, a newcomer to this site is becoming obvious it is platform with someone with crackpot ideas, and when challenged its blighted with trolls.
-
its about giving out duff information.
-
it it cant be proven then this thread should be deleted. its total garbage as is all the other stufftt posted here, it helps no one.
-
Thats how i see it. there was no need to bring a troll into the thread to dance and skip the question.
-
The document doesnt say what tt is saying it does.
-
If TT cant answer a simple question then this thread should be deleted. Its complete garbage and with a troll joining the thread its purpose was clearly designed to misinform.
-
Tomtubby/bailiff advice. Just show us the legislation.
-
Spot on outlawla. Creating this thread to push the idea councils pay bailiffs is utter total rubbish.
-
Here we go again, its FMOTL. No reputable publisher will look at your work. Your post 1 is wrong. Dodgeball post 20 is correct. It applies to proceeds of enforcement, and 'enforcement' is defined in law in section 62 of the tce Act.
-
There is no debate here at all. Post 1 of this thread is a statement, and the 2nd paragraph is wrong.
-
Instead of playing guessing games TT, just answer the question in post 128.
-
I see where this side-step comes from. Didnt really expect an answer anyway. Its all rubbish as we thought it was.
-
What evidence? Legislation.gov.uk doesnt say that.
-
It doesnt matter if they say the NOE has been sent. if Unclebulgaria wants a flaw in the legislation, heres one to have a look at, regulation 7© of the TCGRs. Now look at at regulation 6(1). Whats the point of putting a date on the NOE when the regs say taking control of goods starts from 7 days the NOE is given.
-
This is pie in the sky.
-
TT you still havnt explained the law that says councils have to give money paid direct, must be split pro-rata and a share given to bailiffs. I see the bit about pro-rata applies to proceeds of enforcement, not disputing that. I also dont understand where you think proceeds of enforcement is money other than money raised from the sale of goods.
-
I grasp only that you say its important to know the instruction date, so if a debtor pays council tax after instruction but before getting a NOE, he wants to know the instruction date whether he is liable for the £75. You also said there is a flaw in the legislation, so how would you change it?
-
I dont think its important because the debtor doesnt even know enforcement period has started until he has a NOE. before that its a liability order notice and council tax bills. a SAR isnt needed because you can phone the council and ask for it. The same could be argued about applying for a liability order £100+ and theres no notice of the date of the application is made. You dont know about a camera ticket until after you got one.
-
Thats right. The £75 fee is not dependent on a NOE, only the £235 one is.
-
I see what you are getting at, but is there a case the date is disputed? if it were needed, if ever, then the councils records would provide it.
-
I dont see the gain by giving the instruction date. council tax has lots of letters and notices already so if one is missed then all are missed wrong address, and nothing is due.
-
Ive looked in the regulations and its not there. I cant see how that is a flaw because the debtor only knows enforcement period commences on the NOE. the debt is paid to council, it leaves £75 unpaid. someone has to sue and prove the date the enforcement period started.
-
Another time another place. The discussion is about deducting £75 from money paid to the council/court.
-
Just read it again. I see how you twist it. Are you saying......... psssst, read my lips, what im saying, not you THINK im saying. (cant do blue yet)
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS