Jump to content

Nicky3

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

1 Follower

  1. Both were in reply and relevant to previous posts....the first was a question to the OP, who is still active on the forum, but who I cannot contact by PM. As it stands this thread repeats itself and makes no sense.
  2. I know this is an old thread but I am in the process of seeking a judicial review on this subject, as it is not stated in law that child maintenance must be paid just because a child benefit award remains in place favoring the other party after a child relocates. The reason for my post is because I would like to have some back up for my judicial review from others who have been abused by these rules concocted by the CSA and not supported in legislation. If the OP would PM me (I can’t PM as I am a new member) I would be most grateful. In regard to the post above, I can tell you that a report of child benefit fraud between parents is unlikely to be considered, I have just been told this by the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman and quote: “In cases where the parents cannot agree who should receive Child Benefit, allegations made against the other person are not treated as fraud. The Child Benefit Office says that accusations are often made to gain advantage over the other person and are therefore not classed as verifiable evidence of fraudulent, criminal or non-compliant activity.”
  3. The PHSO told me in their report following my recent complaint: 15. In cases where the parents cannot agree who should receive Child Benefit, allegations made against the other person are not treated as fraud. The Child Benefit Office says that accusations are often made to gain advantage over the other person and are therefore not classed as verifiable evidence of fraudulent, criminal or non-compliant activity. As to whether it is the same in cases like yours, I would expect that it is.
×
×
  • Create New...