Jump to content

jandia

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

1 Follower

About jandia

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. .1 is the cause of action on a statute bar the default notice or the last payment / acknowledgment of the debt? Ie the start date? Default Notice: 20/10/2011 Date of Claim: 13/07/2018 Time between dates: 6 years, 8 months no acknowledgement of debt. Or 20/11/2012 Last payment/acknowledgment of the debt Date of Claim: 13/07/2018 Time between dates: 5 years, 7 months which would win at Court? thk you
  2. I have issued a summons to a builder who has damaged my property. He appointed a firm of solicitors and I will be representing myself. All paperwork has been filed and the court hearing is scheduled in two weeks. I received this morning from the defendant a Notice of Change of Legal Representative, whereby now the defendant shall be acting in person. I just wanted to check with the experts, whether the defendant is able to file such two weeks prior to hearing and is this compliant with court procedures. I have a strong case, it just odd at the last minute his solicitors are
  3. thank you dx, does that mean that the clamant can only now legally enforce the deduced payment amount, which they stated in writing, would be acceptable?
  4. I understand. I am interested in the legality and the enforcement of the CCJ when a reduced offer letter has been issued to the defendant. What is meant by the Court saying that the CCJ is not registered? maybe this is the enforcement part? The claimant would need to pay for the Courts enforcement and when undertaken, I hold a letter from the claimant confirming that they would accept a 50% lower value. There was no statement on their letter stimulating that I must accept the lower value within a certain time or such offer, would be forfeited or withdrawn. Suppose they make the
  5. Thank you for all your input. Yes the CCJ was issued and yet speaking with the Court; they advise it will not affect my credit file, as it has not been registered. I am unsure of the meaning of this registered part. I was wondering how they would enforce all of the debt, when they have already agreed a part settlement and how this plays out should they seek the enforcement.
  6. I was wondering if someone could kindly help clarify this position. I have a CCJ against me dated for value £2k. The Claim was issued in April 2011 and awarded in July 2012. I understand from speaking to the Court that the judgement has not been registered. The claimant has offered me the opportunity to pay £1k and confirmed on receipt of the payment that they will not object to me making the Court payment of approx. £150 to remove the judgement. The questions are. .1 How would you expect the claimant to proceed? In other words, let us suppose they regi
  7. I apologise for the long delay its just mad busy for us during august. The views are essential for the marketing of our rooms. All views are over the sea and the little sailing boats below. We market our property as having these wonderful views. Now with the BT cables, we have these running directly through the waterline and the boats below. It has taken months to motivate BT to look into the issue and I would have thought unreasonable for BT to seek a striking out of any claim based upon time restrictions. So are you saying issue a summons?
  8. Thank you for all the input. So what is the next suggested steps I need to undertake? I was considering an injunction issued in the county court? The poles have always been in place. The lines obstructed my view 30th March 2014 whereby an objection together with photographic evidence was submitted immediately to BT. This triggered heaps of communications, whereby the matter was escalated to the high level BT directors. Openreach outsourced the matter to a third party company for a solution which was found. A pro forma invoice duly arrived for £1,800 to resolve t
  9. Thank you for all the suggestions. As mentioned, I believe, BT Openreach has breached the Telecommunications Act 1984 Chapter 12, Schedule 2, The Telecommunications Code, Paragraph 10, Power to Fly Lines. Power to fly lines 10 (1) Subject to paragraph 3 above and the following provisions of this code, where any [F38 electronic communications apparatus] is kept installed on or over any land for the purposes of the operator’s [F39 network], the operator shall, for the statutory purposes, have the right to install and keep installed lines which— (a) pass over other land
  10. BT has installed flying cables outside my hotel, whereby the sea views have been severely obstructed. I have exhausted all the higher complaint levels within BT and written to both the private secretary and CEO twice via recorded delivery. They fail to reply. I need now to pursue a legal course of action. I believe BT has breach the Telecommunications Act 1984, whereby there is a clause which prohibits BT flying cables which interferes with the carrying on of any business. Our whole business hinges on our views which are now obstructed and guests are complaining. I could is
  11. i was seeking some help and guidance with the below Claim issued from lowells for £11k I sent the CPR request and s77/78 requests. I filed a defense. I received draft directions which had nothing of interest other than they were happy to proceed with mediation. I submitted my draft directions to the court and with a copy to lowells seeking. .1 copy of the Credit Agreement .2 Copy of the Default Notice .3 Deed of assignment Should the Claimant fail to comply with the order, the claim will be struck out. I have received nothing from lowells. Today I
×
×
  • Create New...