Jump to content

Enron

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    2,313
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Enron

  1. DCBL still sending out letters.... no doubt standard procedure, even if the possibility of them winning is next to nothing because of the above signage.
  2. A replacement machine was there as one person was looking at it using their phone. However the above sign was also present.
  3. DCBL back for a second bite of the cherry, this time with a correctly named & addressed letter. Lots of mitigating circumstances including this sign still being up when we visited.
  4. Will double check. Just going to let it run whilst the incorrect name is there as will be at their expense. Not forgetting that they are adding fee's which I believe is against FCA debt collection guidance.
  5. Nothing for a long time - and a DCBL debt collection letter turned up - with someone else's name attached - obviously I feel no need to correct them on this, and will see what other litter comes through the door subsequently.
  6. Wonder if any of you have any advice. Mums eldery friend has had a drop kerb, driveway installed at the cost of £10,000 - from a well respected builder. Planning permission obtained, all work carried out, job done. Council have received a complaint from a local resident, have met with mums friend and the builder and have now said all the work has to be reversed. Didn't think this would be possible if the plans have been followed to the letter. Any idea's? First step I think she needs to get is the decision in writing and why.
  7. In the long run they are losing market share to the likes of Aldi and Lidl. The letter does refer to keeping us as a customer. At the same time as saying normally they would refer us to Parking Eye to appeal.
  8. Asda replied, as a one off gesture of goodwill Parking Eye invoice will be cancelled.
  9. Thanks for the info. The only consent relating to car park signage I can see is a submission by Asda in 2006, which would not apply to a new third party company operating a system on their land. Makes you wonder that if planning permission isn't being obtained for any of these systems being installed nationwide, and they are there illegally without planning or advertising permission, are the monies being collected being obtained unlawfully.
  10. Letter sent to Mr Burnley. Appears that Parking Eye Ltd don't have planning or advertising consent for any of their system/signs in Asda, Newton Abbott. Search on Teignbridge district council website returns nothing - lots of stuff from Asda (from 2006 onward) but nothing relating to car park signage. Signs from car park attached in pdf. 20180502_082844.pdf
  11. Thank you will have photo's later on in the week. And write to asda.
  12. Ticket image attached. Issued 26/04/2018, details removed for privacy. Here you go pf sen.pdf
  13. Definitely no ANPR, looked on the way out. Will post up an image of the ticket later. Photographs to follow, going down in a few days and will swing by.
  14. 1 The date of infringement? 26/04/2018 2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] N If you haven't appealed yet - ,......... (no, parking charge notice attached to windscreen) have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] what date is on it Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? Nothing received yet aide from Parking Charge Notice, I dont think ANPR is on site 3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] ticket mentions POFA - Y 4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] 5 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye Ltd 6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? Asda, Newton Abbot
  15. Can I quickly ask for confirmation for what I have read up on..... If the Notice To Keep (printed out/stuck to screen) doesnt include a duration of contravention then the notice is invalid? Many thanks. No ANPR on the way in or out.
  16. I know someone who appealed to the store manager in their ALDI and had their ticket quashed. If you have the receipt, even better. That might be your easiest route considering that the event wasn't long ago. They might want to keep your custom if you emphasize that you are a regular customer.
  17. Indeed, why would you have to "change comments" over the course of those days, is that an indicator that items have been added into the timeline like a PCN, a Reminder, and another document?
  18. Sorry, redacted too much. Date of event 12/03/2017 - date PCN was supposedly sent 20/03/2017, date reminder was supposedly sent 18/04/2017 Received neither. I believe it's general fear tactics, and a false paper trail as you've highlighted. Gonna sit tight and wait for something to happen, the ace up the sleeve is the Trust sign and having two witnesses that can testify that it was still present in March 2017.
  19. https://www.dropbox.com/s/xcle1zp1uko8bn7/20170809143339695.pdf?dl=0 I've got an interesting response from the BPA regarding non receipt of the PCN, essentially saying if its not sent by recorded delivery you can't ascertain either way whether a letter was sent/received.
  20. https://ibb.co/kSMyKv ericbrother would be grateful if you could look at this to let me know if anything is wrong - have edited out personal details. This is what arrived with my MPs letter of 18th July 2017, 128 days after the parking event occurred. Though they also included a reminder (also not received), a copy of a database with a number of dates purportedly linked to this parking charge notice. And a long rambling letter to justify that everything had been done above board.
  21. Ericsbrother, thanks for your help - there's a complaint on it's way to the FCA regarding addition of charges by ZZPS onto the alleged debt - and the solicitors letters going out stating they are instructed by the DCA. All the correct paperwork was delivered to our MP, a PCN and even a reminder, both of which we had not received. Interestingly it stated that we have replied to every ZZPS letter but not there's - wonder why? Because we haven't received them. Said to MP that was would have either appealed or settled at an early date had these reached us. And that Premier Park Ltd have been less than honest with both us and the MP, they are not going to admit to anyone more so a serving MP that they are involved in dubious practice. pushing him to see if a notice is "presumed sent unless proven otherwise" in Schedule 4 can be amended so that the parking company has to prove it's receipt with a signature. We'll update on this. Trying to see if POPLA can help though, there e-mail has referred me back to Premier Park re not receiving a copy of the notice. Technically i've just received it via the MP.
  22. My MP managed to get hold of a copy of the PCN which was forwarded to me - ZZPS have added an additional £72 on as (an administration fee) which would run contrary to the above, also there is a mention of 29 days in there by Premier Park, really need to scan and put up but our scanner is broke at the moment.
×
×
  • Create New...