Jump to content

bungletoes

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bungletoes

  1. i believe so, the reference number seems to the same one across all letters.
  2. this is what i thought, thanks guys. i've been ill for most of december and with that, the resurgence of these letters threw me in more stress. i'll report back if i get anything that looks properly official.
  3. Hi, looking for a bit of advice about this pcn charge i was sent through the post last year. the first letter i received was in march/april for an supposed "parked in a restricted area" in a free carpark of a cinema, the letter claims either the car had a pcn attached to the car or was issued through the post, i never had anything on my car and the first letter i received was a reminder. it also claimed the car was documented but the letter had no pictures or anything. i browsed this site at that time and various others through google and saw the general consensus of "ignore" and watched as the usual letters followed through my postbox. it was from VCS first, a charge of 80 i think and then 100, it then went to Roxburghe debt collectors where was 160. i got a few of these and then came the graham white letter that i was going to court. all these were shoddy looking and i continued to follow the advice of ignoring and nothing happend. i believe the last letter i got from these were in september time. december rolls around and i start to get letters from rossendales collect with a price of 136 for a different company called excel parking, still the same client reference. these looked more professional but still had strange wording, like they couldn't tell if i was male or female despite the name that the letters were address to and in the letter it had stuff like "an administration fee of has been added" i continued to ignore these and now i've been sent a final demand which wants the money first thing next week. these letters are full of the same wording, they "may" do this, they "may" recommend to their client, "may" go to the court. browsing around the net today about this for the first time since first letter last year i see the law has changed? its no longer recommended to ignore? i have no idea what to do now and really can't pay this charge for what feels like a huge damn [problem]. i'm pondering just waiting to see if they try and get a ccj or something, its weird as hell i have two different companies names now, did one buy the other? it all seems like bull**** to me but i'm interested to know what kind of rights i have considering that fake graham white letter they sent me. i still have all the letters in my office but i've only found 2 of the olds letters so far, still sorting through my storage but i know i still have the rest. i really dont want to deal with this **** and i'm hoping i can still ignore since i had these letters from before this new law came in?
×
×
  • Create New...