Jump to content

legalrights

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

1 Follower

  1. i dont know why i came here , bit of a waist of time no offense to people intersted in law mayeb they should get a qualification in it and some experience then i would listen to them not jsut some case about some guy caught sleeping lol, cab are firm that i have a case , thats all i need to know.
  2. I dont really take advise from anyone that does not know the law tbh but was nice having a chat about it at least smokejumper is on my side ha haaaaaaaa
  3. And for your information i had refused in the previous discussions, they just demanded it and lied by saying because im part time i have to take it at the end.
  4. I dont really think you can compare that to the case im talking about. thanks anyway
  5. It also states No doubt where a collective agreement or workforce agreement is in force this will be with the appropriate parties to that agreement other than the employer.
  6. i did not refuse to do anything ,i was not asked to work on there was nothing more i could do i did not know how to finish the job they then started to lock up the office according to the company policy if i have a problem i must return to the office and inform the manager that there has been a problem which i done its also not my obligation to work on after this point of informing them of the problem .it was not my fault they did not train me I then went on my break legally entitled to me , which according to them should be taken at the end because im a part timer I was then later accused because i did not inform them at earlier time (no specific time) then that was the problem I was also completely stressed out because i had not had a break so whatever u think i should of done or wotever u can blame the stress
  7. Marie can u please hurry up and show me , ill be at the tribunal by the time we get to the end of this ! thats 3 days now
  8. f, In previous discussions reagarding the matter ,The reason i was given is that " because im a part time employee i must take my break at the end (under any circumstances , even when i had told them i was feelign dizzy and stressed ,which i was again. )" this was also there answer to it in writing during the dismissalicon in relation to break at the end, i had not abandoned my duties,i had took my "legal" break.I had enforced my legal rights to a break.And my rights as a part time worker. and yes i had informed some one the job was not done who as far as i know is responsible for arranging for it to be done.Then i left. legally and going by the orders given , i was not in a position to continue without damage to my health
  9. Btw , i am just wondering is instant unfair dismissal a 100% win or do they still take other things into consideration like if they think my conduct contributed etc.
  10. 1. In previous discussions reagarding the matter ,The reason i was given is that " because im a part time employee i must take my break at the end (under any circumstances , even when i had told them i was feelign dizzy and stressed ,which i was again. )" this was also there answer to it in writing during the dismissal in relation to break at the end, i had not abandoned my duties,i had took my "legal" break.I had enforced my legal rights to a break.And my rights as a part time worker. 2. no i dont think anyone has to do that do they? although legally and contractually the break should not be at the end anyway. do u actually have an example to show me?
  11. In previous discussions reagarding the matter ,The reason i was given is that " because im a part time employee i must take my break at the end" this was also there answer to it in writing during the dismissal.
×
×
  • Create New...