Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About TimetogoRAM

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Hi mate did you get your application into the property chamber? Sounds like a real battle on your hands.
  2. Apple - My reply to the chamber to stop the striking out of the applications is looming and any help is appreciated? Cheers TTGR
  3. What's the name of the group fighting them please?
  4. Some of these posts are out order. It's none of anyone's business apart from IIM & their friend!
  5. I'm not sure the judge has put an application into the chamber either. Although if I was them after all this and if I had a mortgage with an unsigned deed I would! I was merely stating that you seem a lot more bothered than everyone else? Which sols do you work for? Are you dodgeball as well mate? That said, I do appreciate you clearing that up. I don't believe any thing in this thread is really important since probably half way through it. I do believe all we have got now are pointless posts like my few posts tonight, total repetition from you and dodgeball and complete speculation about the chamber result. Completely pointless until the judgment I'd say!
  6. Ben you seem more bothered about the chamber result than the people that have actually put in an application , is it me, Apple and the judge. What is in it for you and why are you so intent on bringing this whole thread down? 28 days from the day of the hearing was 17th. You got that wrong as well mate!
  7. All deeds have to be signed by both parties. Lenders know very well what they are doing. Molly - They are not signing the deeds purposely so they can securitise your supposed debt in other words sell this on to an SPV. Once your property is sold or they repossess your house then your deed will be signed thus executed. Lenders know what they are doing as this is proven if you can get hold of a deed from your lender to an SPV in that the deed will be signed by both directors of the companies. Molly read the early pages of this thread to get the understanding and then do your homework on your own mortgage/loan. Hope this helps!
  8. Not surprising... Read this thread and Get your application into the chamber ASAP mate!
  9. This is very interesting. The offer document that you talk about, which you state may be fraudulent. Are you saying that you lost the original offer document and then they have produced a copy of a document which is now signed by you? And your lender? Or both? Like you say, how can the judge allow a possession order to go ahead on the basis of terms and conditions of the very document you are disputing? When did you take the mortgage out? How many months arrears? When did Nram begin these legal repossession proceedings? Have you considered challenging the actual mortgage deed?
  10. Sorry Apple, I didn't mean I had one. I just need to get Ben to tell me exactly which pages of the 700 I need to look at at? I will go library like sequenci then. Ben over to you......
  11. Ben - thanks for taking the time to sort of answer my questions. I'm trying to find the page where you've posted up this part of Harlsbury Law. I want to see for myself. What pages of volume 77 am I looking for?
  12. Hi Ben, Any chance you could answer the following questions? 1. Why do you think the Property Chamber are sending out previous cases in this way? 2. Who do you think is making this decision to send these cases out? 3. Why do you think Lenders are constantly breaking Tribunal rules by a) demanding applicant costs to be added to the mortgage contrary to Tribunal Rule13 (1) b) failing to send their customer written notice of which solicitor has been instructed contrary to Tribunal Rule 14 (2) 4. Why do you think the Chamber is staying the proceedings pending outcome of similar cases? Tribunal Rule 3 (m) & 23 5. Why do you think the Lender is yet to put forward their written objections? 6. What do you think about the Chamber allowing a Lender to not submit written objections before the deadline, due to the case being stayed, despite nothing in Tribunal Rule 23 or 30 referring to this? 7. Why do you think Is it me's friend's Lender has used 3 solicitors? 8. Why do you think the Chamber has not struck out any case? Tribunal Rule 9
  13. Really strange behaviour. It's almost as if the Chamber are trying to put a stop to this. I know the lender are definitely using tactics to put a stop to it... I have again been copied in to a third email to the Chamber, which is again requesting more time to submit objections to the application. What makes me laugh is that they mention requesting more time because the application has been stayed pending the outcome of similar applications and due to "the tight deadline" - what tight deadline? They've had plenty of time to submit objections. I am still yet to receive any notification from my lender that they have instructed a solicitor - contrary to rule 14 (2) They also again mention saving costs - which they would like to add will be added to the borrowers mortgage account - contrary to rule 13 (1)©
  14. Well done PJ! I didn't have access to a scanner till later.. Saved me a job. Thanks for this. The first line of this document underlined says it all really - County Court unapproved judgement
  15. What I don't understand is - 1. who is the Applicant who asked this to be sent? 2. Why would an Applicant send a case through that still harps on about section 2 LPMPA 89? 3. Why are the Property Chamber doing the dirty work of the lenders? I think I need to make a call to the Chamber tomorrow. All very confusing!
  • Create New...