Jump to content

GardenBench

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About GardenBench

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Thanks for all the reply s but it seems the post has gone a bit off track. From Tinkermans response I take it that it is a bad idea for me to take the DCA back to court but this seems very unfair. Surely if you follow the letter of the law you cannot have a charging order on someone's property for a debt that you no longer own! Why would a judge not allow this if at the time of completing the form the incorrect DCA name was registered with the land registry?
  2. Thanks for the input. The reason I am looking to get the restriction removed is that the debt is for a shortfall mortgage from before I met my husband. He bought the house we currently live in and my name was only put on (after a lot of discussion, I didn't really want it to happen) following a health scare he had. You can imagine now that every time we have a row he starts having a go about my debt being secured on his house! To tell the truth I completely agree with him. What I am thinking is if I apply to the court to have the charge removed they will
  3. The new owners have not subsituted themselves as claimants with the courts and I am now paying the new owners the court agreed instalment every month even though I have no legal document to say they are entitled to collect it. If I went back to court now with a set a side defence of - The company who got the original judgement sold the debt to another company who obtained a charging order who then sold it to another company who after 12 months have not substituted themselves with the courts and therefore the charging order is invalid as I do not owe the company have it anythin
  4. Good evening Caggers, could I please run a thought past you and get some opinions. I have a charging order (restriction really) on my property and it has come to light that the party named on the restriction sold the ccj and restriction within weeks of getting it (January 2012). I have checked with the land registry and county court and they have not substituted themselves as claimants with the court and therefore the restriction has the wrong company's name on it. Would it be worth a go at having the restriction removed via the court as the company named on it no
×
×
  • Create New...