Jump to content

Brownguy53

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    248
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

51 Excellent

About Brownguy53

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Huh? No a member of cag helped me and asked not to be named.I dont speak with halfords and this case was ended a few years ago I just never really logged on since but wanted to update everyone so that others who suffer mistreatment can GI forward and use this as an example
  2. Hi I have replied by pm on who helped me but please can you not share who it was as they specifically asked me not to name them and I do want to respect their wishes and without all of you I would not have won so I would Like to thank you all. I did get the full 1900
  3. hey just to update everyone, I did win the case..well in a way. Halfords lawyer rang me about 3 weeks before the trial date and stated there client was 'desperate' to settle this outside of court. Their lawyer did try and trick me with a confidentality claus but thanks to a great member on here who has asked not to be named they spotted this clause and i told halfords it needed to be removed, they did remove it..got a cheque for the amount i wanted which was suitable to replace the vehicle a week later . Morale of the story if you know your right go with it..big thanks to everyone on CAG who h
  4. Well Halfords's solicitor tried to call me yesterday regarding my letter sent to them re-the BBC letter and they've made me another offer to update you all of £1825 now. They also mentioned Halfords want done with the matter and that it would be agreed in a Tomlin Order. I understand what all of you are saying and such about the he/she said stuff but, my claim is for roughly £3300 in total. So £1825 is a bit low. I also accept what your all saying that maybe an IT expert won't be accepted by the court in terms of cost, but the claim can go up to £5000 in small claims court from my understandin
  5. Halfords have rejected my £1900 offer said its £1750 or court. I did not send emails of the nature they state and to be honest I will prove it and that they have created these emails IMO! I can't prove it (that they created them as a dustraction but I know its true!!) but I think its some smog to take the heat off their weak case , and I am even tempted to going to say to them will they pay for an expert witness or go 50/50 on an expert witness to analyse my mobile phone/laptop to prove that the emails were not sent by me.
  6. They wouldn't be making offers if they weren't scared..they've let this go on 1 year so whats 2 more months to me? No skin off my back. If they want to create fictional fraudalent emails to blackwash a judge good luck to them as I'll be getting a detailed report from my Internet Provider including my IP address matched to that of that alleged email when as per above I get the email back from them..to prove I have not sent it and nothing to do with it, one thing I am not is a liar. Also will do the same for my mobile phone..and when I prove I have nothing to do with this alleged email I will be
  7. Well what you all say is true I assume, but I've addressed their rubbish allegation now, probably of which theyve created IMO.
  8. Friday 18th December 2015 Dear Sirs, Not without prejudice Further to my email sent today. I am now writing to raise the issue of an alleged BBC E-mail. I have already told the mediator at mediation (without prejudice) - as you may surely know - that I have no knowledge of any BBC Watchdog email. I require to know where you have got this information and I require you to disclose a copy of the alleged full email to be sent to me. It is an extremely serious allegation that I am attempting to pervert th
  9. Yeah Eversir going to see what they say now really and have a good think, but you all raise good points. Thanks for the advice and help everyone...unsure what to do moving on but will have a deep think..if they give £1900 will settle..
  10. l..ive emailed them and said this.. Dear xxxxx Firstly, I am sorry if Halfords felt I was being overzealous in refusing their witness and if you did Mr xxx also, but I do not know what words have been exchanged by Halfords/xxxx in agreeing a expert witness and this is all of which the context of my email referred to, in the same advice put forward to me at the preliminary hearing and no accusation was meant towards Foot Anstey to being dishonest. Secondly, the failure to meet the Court's deadline for agreeing the identity and cost of an expert is not as a result of myself I feel
  11. 1750 is what the car was worth and I would ask for you guys at CAGS help now, as in my reply should I not be saying that I was not sent the hearing notes from the prem hearing with dates and that I did email and write to the courts? My understanding was a email was that of the same of a letter. Moreover unsure on what you guys think about this 'unreasonable behaviour' argument they are bringing. Am slightly unsure as to who sent what emails but can only assume it's someone who was a troll or doesn't like Halfords? I have suffered a short loss of earnings, the towing cost and also the original
  12. i've then had a second offer made to me in reference to the case in this email: Without Prejudice Save As To Costs and Subject to Contract Dear Sir Claim No: XXXX We write further to the previous without prejudice discussions on this matter. In short, our client denies that it is the cause of the extent of the engine oil overfill suffered by your vehicle or any subsequent damage as alleged (for the reasons set out in our client's Defence). Consequently, our client does not therefore accept that it is also liable for the expenses that you have sought to claim as a result.
  13. I got an email about 1 week later offering me Halfords witness who was £600.00. I did not get the judge's written hearing notes from the preliminary hearing, so ideally I was aware that dec/january was the time the car needed to be done by by request of the judge. I therefore wasn't sure how to proceed and did write to the court asking them if I could make my expert witness a normal witness and I had no reply and on 23rd November emailed the courts asking for advice on wether I had to accept or reject Halford's expert witness offer,of which I had no response. I have done what Ford sent ye
×
×
  • Create New...