Yes. I see. The word "perjury" had not come to mind.I presume you mean that this claimant could be seen as having used the civil courts as a platform to commit an act of deception, with the intention of obtianing money by "deception"Which could be regarded as a contrivention of the civil justice act. How would one begin to persue such a situation ?

Hello again all and a very good evening.Once again, the point that I am trying to emphasise is thus :-For example.In one County Court I claim against a party or parties that I require rent arrears to paid to myself on a premises which I state is under my sole control, as I am the sole leaseholder.At the SAME TIME, I also claim in another County Court in the neighbouring county that I am NOT the sole leasholder and that I have no control over the premises.Therefore I protest that I am not the defendent when I am in receipt of an action against me regarding the said premises.It seems as though this individual wants things both ways according to the time of day.Yes it is my premisesorNo it is not my premises

Hello all and thanks for your interest.The point that I am making is that this individual claimed in my local county court that he is the landlord with full rights and control over the premises concerned.Yet at the same time , he is claiming in his defence submitted to his local court that he has no control over or rights to the premises concerned.Does his denial then make his claim possibly bogus.

There is most certainly no right to lien in this situation, no repair work or any other work was carried out; it was quite simply vehicle storage.As I pointed out.In breath this individual is shouting that he is the lease holder with the full rights to the premises.Then, within a few days when facing a "return & deliver up" claim from us, he then shouts that he is not the defendent and has no control over the premises.

Hello and a very good evening to you all, here is my first question. I was taken to the small claims court by an individual who claimed that I owed him rent money for the storage of two vehicles. These vehicles never belonged to me, they were the property of a company of which I am a director. Not withstanding that fact, the judge still allowed him a little bit of the money he tried to claim. Why I don't understand ! So to my question. Following straight on from this claim, we the company issued a claim agianst the same individual for the return of our vehicles. [he was holding them against our wishes] He immediately protested to the court that he "was not the defendent" in this claim and that he had no responsibility for the operation or tenure of the building in which our vehicles were stored. Does this then mean that his claim against me when he stated that he alone was the lease holder and had the full rights to the premises could now be considered "Bogus"