Thewigster
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
30 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
1 Neutral-
i have the name and number of the chap who is in charge of planning etc , what do you suggest > leave it and see if Napier persue it ( which i expect they will ) or appeal it. if i appeal it though , would the grounds be that i contest the charge based on the fact the signage is misleading due to not CLEARLY displaying the terms of the contract being offered ? thanks again
-
I would estimate the bottom of the sign must be 7ft from ground level. As I said I'm 6ft and I can stand comfortably under it. Yes the signage by the machine is identical but in all honesty I don't think the lettering on that is big enough either. Regarding how long they have been there I don't know. The car park used to be used as a market a few years ago and was owned by wolsey theatre. Don't know if the sold it or they lease it to napier? ?
-
Got a letter Friday offering an awareness course so happy with that. Thanks for everyone's replies.
-
Just a quick one on this , ive been sent a NIP for allegedly doing 46 in a 40 by manned camera . i remember seening a white van with a window cut out but no markings anywhere on it . Are these things still enforceable or does it come under the old entrapment as there was no way of me knowing it was a camera van ? Thx all
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.