Jump to content

Baron Von Vaderham

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. Further - I just spoke to my solicitor about this, he's checked it out and says that there is no way of avoiding the Bailiff fees. Unfortunate, but there we go.
  2. Finally managed to get through to HMCS payments. I've been informed that once it goes over to Marston's, HMCS place an 'inhibit' (their term) on the account, preventing any payment of the fine, preventing any circumventing of Marstons. If I send money or payment by post, it will be returned. This is done on all distress warrants on magistrates fines. I suspect if I pay Marstons the £150 fine ammount they will use that purely as a payment towards their fees, leaving the original fine unpaid. I think that the only reason they have'nt given us more grief is that we live in a farm in the middle of nowhere.
  3. It seems I've opened a can of worms. It would be nice to get some kind of certainty to the question, as I'm sure I'm not the only one to come up against this issue.
  4. What really infuriates me is Marstons attitude that I have to pay the whole thing right now. I would gladly pay the original fine to HMCS, but the law seems to sanction this kind of daylight robbery. The more I think about this, the more incensed I get - its less about punishing people for wrongdoing, and more about making money off the backs of people who can ill afford it in the first place. This kind of business should not be put with the private sector, where making a profit is the main concern. Thankfully, I'm not some old lady or other kind of easy pushover. I think I frightened the Marstons bailiff off when he showed me the charges - I managed to go from 0 - Full Rant Mode in about 0.01 seconds Anyhow, it would appear that there is no way round this issue .
  5. Well, as stated, my fine was £150, but Marston's charges are £275. I guess thats my biggest reason for complaint - If a defendant is struggling to pay £150, how do they think that £425 is going to be achievable? I also would still be interested in whether it is legal for a Bailiff to try to get you to borrow the money, as I think this is classed as incitement to commit fraud.
  6. Whilst I can see the logic of the argument you present, in reality if HMCS refuse to accept the payment, and insist it has to go through Marstons, it becomes very difficult to implement.
  7. Apologies for starting a dispute, I read extensive threads on here, and there seemed to be a contradiction in advice. Certainly if you read Form EX345, it states (contrary to what people think) that CEO's are fully entitled to charge for their services. So whats your advice Tomtubby (feel free to preface it as without predjudice!) - Pay the fine and the fees? or dig my heels in?
  8. Interesting indeed. I think this enquiry has thrown up a possible condradiction on the advice given in the forum - partially the original reason for me starting another Marston Thread. So on one hand we have an official court document stating that Marstons are fully entitled to charge the fees. And on the other hand, a possibility that as their is no contract between myself and Marstons, then there is no obligation for me to pay these fees. I do know that if you give Marston the origanal fine amount, they will put that towards discharging thier debt, and not the original fine. So where does that leave us? and given the volume of similar enquiry's and calls for help on this exact same subject on CAG, it would be very helpful to get a definitive answer.
  9. So I've done a bit more research on the site, with slightly worrying results - Reading this sticky thread above, Thread: MAGISTRATE COURT FINES. Template of a Statutory Declaration. I read the following - then the ONLY way to get this debt away from the bailiff and returned to the court is by way of a Statutory Declaration. A valid statutory declaration will REVOKE the distress Warrant and all bailiff fees will then have to be removed. Being as my magistrates fine was issued in 2008, then it would be wrong (and silly) of me to make a statutory declaration - and it would seem from this that there is no way of getting the debt away from Marston. So why the conflicting advice?
  10. Thanks Brassnecked, I'm told the ATM will give out a slip confirming the payment - only problem is the Court is 65 Flippin' miles away, and I don't fancy very much going there only to find out it wont accept my payment or some other kind of bureaucratic sillyness.
  11. Ok, the saga continues. Just spoke to HMCS Cheshire, where the nice lady tells me that they have NO counter facilities for accepting payments in person anymore. They have an ATM machine at the magistrates court suitable for taking payment... but can I trust this to take it?
  12. If only I could pay the Court! They absolutely refuse to take payment, and insist I have to deal with Marston. Its hard to MAKE them take payment. thanks for your continued assistance Bartok.
×
×
  • Create New...