Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About joannes

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Name of the Claimant BRITTANIA PARKING claimants Solicitors: BW LEGAL Date of issue – 13TH FEB 2019 Date to acknowledge) = 3RD MARCH date to submit defence = 15TH MARCH What is the claim for 1.THE CLAIMANTS CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £85.00 BEING MONIES DUE FROM THE CLAIMANT IN RESPECT OF A PCN ISSUED 05/04/2016 AT 2124 AT CHELMSFORD ARMY AND NAVY ANPR. THE PCN RELATES TO vehicle details included. 2.THE TERMS OF THE PCN ALLOWED THE DEFENDANT 28 DAYS FROM THE ISSUE DATE TO PAY THE PCN BUT THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO DO SO. 3.DESPITE DEMAND HAVING BEEN MADE THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO SETTLE THEIR LIABILITY. THE CLAIM INCLUDES STATUTORY INTEREST PURSUANT TO SECTION 69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM A DAILY RATE OF 0.02 FROM 5/4/16 TO 12/02/19 BEING A TOTAL AMOUNT OF £20.88. THE CLAIMANT ALSO CLAIMS £60.00 CONTRACTUAL COSTS PURSUANT TO PCN TERMS AND CONDITIONS. What is the value of the claim? £240.88 Has the claim been issued by the Private parking Company or was the PCN assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim ? PRIVATE PARKING COMPANY Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  2. I sent letters off as per post 3 to both Brittania and Law firm (loose definition i know!) and received a response from BW legal citing Combined Parking Solutions V AJH Films and from Brittania saying they are not in breach of Kadoe as they have not implied keeper liability on the original PCN and are relying on the implied contract with the driver prior to PFA 2012, which means they have until the 35th day to provide notice of this. I have now received a County Court Form to complete. I am now a bit confused on how to respond. A couple of questions, I have photograph taken from the site 4 months after alleged contravention (Aug 16) showing signage detailing that a parking charge of £70 may be charged, whereas the original PCN / NTK says an £85 charge is due, is this an example of them unilaterally moving the gate posts again? Any further advise would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Jo
  3. Just a quick question, as I'm about to send the letter off to BW Legal, shall i sign it ( i've read on a few posts the suggestion that you just print your name) and would you also send a copy to Brittania Parking as well? Thanks for the great advice you give here, it's really appreciated.
  4. it was an ANPR capture, with 4 images of vehicle on the rear of original PCN
  5. Morning All, I wonder if you could offer me some help please. As vehicle's registered keeper, I've received a letter of claim from BW Legal and understand from reading previous posts that this does need to be responded to. I've ignored all previous correspondence from Brittania, DRP and Zenith because my understanding was that the NTK needed to arrives by the 15th day following the alleged contravention (it actually arrived on the 24th day!) i have kept copies of all previous correspondence sent. Any advice on how to respond to them would be really appreciated. 1 Date of the infringement 5th April 2016 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 27th April 2016 3 Date received 29th April 2016 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] NO 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? YES registration details with small date/ time stamp at top of image 6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up 7 Who is the parking company Brittania 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Chelmsford, Essex, Army and Navy Car park CM2 7PU For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA Thanks, Jo
  6. Morning all, An update, I have just received a response from the parking co-ordinator at the hospital stating that they have reviewed the photographic evidence which shows that the vehicle was not displaying a blue badge at the time and that they have a photograph of the vehicle being driven away before a windscreen ticket could be issued. Therefore for the reasons stated, the ticket was issued fairly in line with current procedures and no breaches of data protection have taken place. They have however agreed to cancel the notice which is good news. A quick question regarding this, should they then have sent the photographic evidence in the first instance with the notice to keeper as per Ericsbrother in above post? Thanks Jo
  7. Thanks for the advice, I'll fire a letter off to the trust and let you know their response. Jo
  8. Hi there, No windscreen ticket, first we knew about it was the notice to keeper detailed above. I've uploaded. Thanks Jo Gemini Parking.pdf
  9. Hi all, Just received a Notice to Keeper from Gemini stating that the vehicle broke the following condition, parking in a disabled bay. The registered keeper is disabled and was receiving treatment as the time within the hospital, to the best of knowledge the blue badge was displayed. is it worth appealing given these circumstances? The notice also says that they contacted the keeper recently, they didn't this is the first we have heard of this. Any advice would be appreciated. Date of infringement 18th October 2018 Date of the NTK 21st November 2018 Date Received 23rd November 2018 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? No 6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal] Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Not yet 7 Who is the parking company? Gemini Parking 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Broomfield Hospital Chelmsford Essex For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA Many thanks, Jo
  • Create New...