Jump to content

Always Struggling

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    438
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

42 Excellent
  1. Just got a letter from SCM asking for my Witness Statement as they haven't got it yet. Sent them a Statement of Case already I hope that if I resend the Statement of Case renamed as 'Witness Statement' and covering letter explaining my error to both them and the court this will be ok? Can someone confirm this please? Thanks AS
  2. I will remember to bring it up in the next hearing Back to SoC... does this look right andy? Also have added a point I am still unclear on - 14. Let me know if I should leave '14' out or not please andy. Just have to get page numbers right for evidence WS2 Thanks AS
  3. I haven't submitted a defence andy, I have made a claim which they have defended and applied for a strike out. The J told me I must make a statement of truth and submit supporting evidence to my claim of section 32 (1) Limitations Act. This is where I am unsure. Is it a) WS with supporting evidence, b) a Statment of Case with evidence, or c) an order under rule 18.1 to provide further information? All I remember from the court was her saying provide a statement of truth and supporting evidence, it was all a bit of a blur tbh. Thanks for any guidance AS
  4. Ok thanks andy, was getting lost as was thinking along the lines that it's their claim to strike out and I am defending that.....or so I thought confusing me, quite easily lol AS
  5. Have 'tweaked' it accordingly andy ty...... maybe should have listened to you and made more of an effort to be succinct in the first place instead of going off with my 'principles' and going off on tangents:oops: lol Just to clarify, this is actually a 'Statement of Truth' How should it begin and end precisely please. Thanks AS
  6. Any comments welcome. I need to print off tomorrow night ready for sending Wednesday to make sure it arrives for Friday to SCM.
  7. P.S. wasn't sure on how to include the defences para 26 and 29 as you mention Mike tbh. Any advice on those would be appreciated also Thanks AS
  8. Have constructed the following WS Mike, appreciate your views, however harsh. Not sure on the last few points if they should be included or not as they are more recent events of the defences 'dodgy' behaviour.
  9. I get the feeling you're going to tell me it needs amending Got to go to bed Mike will read anything you recommend asap Thanks AS
  10. Time for me to get to bed, home for a couple of hours - tea, post then bed lol. The above points have the relevant evidence to be attached as well to back up my conclusions. Thanks for any help you can give. AS
  11. I am hoping I am thinking along the right lines here. Basically it is as basic as possible with relating evidence to back up these facts of my claim. Let me know if it is on the right track and if it is I know you guys won't hold back on pulling it apart lol. Thanks AS
  12. Yes Slick, the silver lining is that I had a big learning curve from this. It may have felt like 2 experts v 1 novice but better to have that now than to have it easy at this stage then land her at the hearing and with me thinking this is going to be a doddle. Simple rule: prepare, prepare then prepare somemore and write down everything you want covered. unlike me with this first time which seriously made me feel like a deer in headlights lol
×
×
  • Create New...