Jump to content

meekmeek

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

51 Excellent

About meekmeek

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. how is back to the point before the pointless flaming began its normal to think that a manager - a person of authority when asking a worker "can i see what you are doing on screen" or "can i check what is in your documents folder" or "for routine security checks i need to gain access to your user profile to do random security checks" a worker would deem it fine to allow this in fear of saying no will lead to questions such as "why not what are you hiding" so if a manager asks a worker can i use your user profile to check something then a worker would deem it fine as that p
  2. sarels advice has been to many - story is unclear so cant advise dont deal with hypotheticals its not happened yet so cannot comment well sarel uses fancy words like tupe and that lot to look good but forgets to offer actual practical advice about the wat if's so that the person is prepared for anything you think bomb disposal workers learn by just opening the box and seeing what happens and then seeking advice after once they know whats inside pfft thats a stupid and narrowminded way of giving advice its better to give OP possibilities such as like i was saying the OP
  3. back to the point before the pointless flaming began its normal to think that a manager - a person of authority when asking a worker "can i see what you are doing on screen" or "can i check what is in your documents folder" or "for routine security checks i need to gain access to your user profile to do random security checks" a worker would deem it fine to allow this in fear of saying no will lead to questions such as "why not what are you hiding" so if a manager asks a worker can i use your user profile to check something then a worker would deem it fine as that pers
  4. the OP gave access to the pc to a superior of theirs not a colleague. -with following manager orders is a part of a persons job role. -where managers have more powers and responsibilities MAY be allowed to access others logins for multiple reasons. -where declining a request for access may have led to a breach of trust and faith as a manager could then have said they had "reasonable belief" OP was hiding something as they refused access when asked employer just simply having a case of you gave manager a password which lead to your sacked is not good enough OP defense should be to
  5. again seral has mis understood what points i was making - i was going to try explaining better but instead i will just say this the op wants lists of possiblities and things to ease their mind - any advice is better then just saying wait and see whats inside the box and then come back to us - [not verbatim] imagine the advice was given to a bomb disposal expert asking for training before taking on a possible suspect box - he comes to a forum seeking advice about a future possibility and the only response he gets was. nothing has happened yet so dont worry just wait and see wha
  6. did the manager concerned get dismissed for fraud by adjusting his wages? if not then this alone should mean you should have been given a lesser punishment out of box thinking if so imagine it was a murder case and someone asked you for a persons address and you did not know why but gave them it- that person then gets murdered is if fair the murderer gets a slapped wrist and you get the jail time simply because you gave the murderer access to the victim but if both dismissed then it would be worth reading into employment terms and conditions about the privacy and access restrict
  7. can i just ask prior to this new target were you positioned on a till because you did not have to be a sales person asking questions and talking and listening to customers ie they found it acceptable with your disability to simply scan the products through the till and limit your interactions to a hi - thats £20 - thank you for shopping here - goodbye as now setting you a target if you never had a target can be seen as a change of job role were there other targets you had set before this as there could be grounds that you can be made exempt from having targets set if no target w
  8. the authories contract does not effect your mothers contract simply because they have won a bid the local area contract is a 'deal' or 'agreement' between the council and the the charity. your mothers employment is a 'deal' or 'agreement' between your mother and the charity. they are two separate things. if your mother had a expiry date then there would be a few things to worry about at expiry but your mother is on a permanent contract and so your mother has less to worry about. normally winning a contract like this [as it sounds like it will increase area's of work] would mean
  9. if getting on and off a moving vehicle is classed as a health and safety issue and worthy of gross misconduct hearing then the fact that your colleagues recieved warnings shows that they did commit a offence otherwise the verdict would have been innocent with no warning or slapped wrist at all the difference between you and other colleagues may be how you dealt and responded with the hearing where they may have been apologetic and pleaded that they would not get on wagon x in that manner again where you may have suggested that your within your right to do it and feel that you can continue
  10. from what i read " I have been given a list of four jobs that it has been established I have the skill set for." and a 5th job came to light "Expression of interest were invited from all staff for 2 jobs that were not on my skill set list " ;i would say the ring fence gives you strength for the initial 4 jobs to get a interview but the 5th job is free for anyone to apply for and for any employer to request a interview with based on cv or statement i would say by 5th job not being in your skill set is the reason why you did not get a interview. the personal statement are usually as
  11. i believe what you recieved through the post was a offer as it was not signed and posted back to then become a contract - until you show that you have accepted it either verbally or more formally with a signature then it is treated as a offer which unless it say please reply by march [imaginary date] then the offer can be withdrawn did the delivered papers have a reply by date as that shows more of a case that they should leave the offer open until the expiry date did you sign it or say you accepts offer A or B prior with either boss or his friend prior to the renewal it might b
  12. agreed as soon as you type in ladies into google images the results [thumbnails] end up on the hard drive - also by inapropriate use of internet by visiting facebook is considered inapropriate as it has no bases towards the business in other words unless is a manufacturing website then any website could be considered as inapropriate. each file on a pc is date stamped [right click properties of a file and look at "created" date] if you have a set time you go out for shop floor call outs or a lunchbreak hopefully this created date falls within one of these times and so thats your
  13. (edit - previous thread re-opened) ok here goes i decided to via telephone inform the investigator that i am declining the job offer on medical grounds as my resignation letter stated that there was no positive way forward in staying with the company and could not find a alternative job role or location that would avoid future business issues or stress. he replied in saying he understood and the next step would be to write my reasons to decline the job offer to HR. 5 minutes later he phones me up all apologetic about the circumstances of 2009-2010 and said treat this as off th
  14. i would say head office say they do not care about the swap between £7-30 unsociable hours pay for the intial hour and the same figure for the overtime as a way of avoiding telling the truth [in my opinion only] what they are hoping is that they can be rid of you within 2 months and so in that short period they can live with the finances the way they are. it is hard to know a head office true end gameplan but i would suggest atleast getting it officially noted down on a grievance or something how these changes wont benefit employee - business - or customer as you can then refer to this l
×
×
  • Create New...